Summary
The Appellate Division, Second Department affirmed the denial of a petition for leave to serve a late notice of claim against Nassau BOCES under General Municipal Law § 50-e(5). The court held that the petitioner offered no reasonable excuse for the delay, Nassau BOCES lacked timely actual knowledge of the essential facts constituting the claim, and the petitioner failed to show that the delay would not substantially prejudice the respondent.
Holdings
- Leave to serve a late notice of claim was properly denied because the petitioner offered no reasonable excuse for the delay, failed to establish that Nassau BOCES acquired timely actual knowledge of the essential facts constituting the claim, and failed to meet his initial burden of showing that the delay would not substantially prejudice Nassau BOCES.
Questions Presented
- Whether the petitioner established grounds under General Municipal Law § 50-e(5) for leave to serve a late notice of claim.
- Whether the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the petition and effectively dismissing the proceeding.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (10)
- Matter of Ippolito v City of New York, 230 AD3d 683, 683-684(followed)
- Matter of Simpson v City of New York, 222 AD3d 986, 986(followed)
- Matter of C.N. v City of New York, 208 AD3d 784, 785(followed)
- Matter of Roman v New York City Hous. Auth., 212 AD3d 816, 818(followed)
- Matter of Grandberry v City of New York, 206 AD3d 654, 655-656(followed)
- Matter of Molme v New York City Tr. Auth., 177 AD3d 601, 602(followed)
- Matter of Harding v Yonkers Cent. Sch. Dist., 170 AD3d 725, 726(followed)
- Matter of Charles v County of Orange, N.Y., 164 AD3d 1232, 1233(followed)
- Matter of Ramos v Board of Educ. of the City of N.Y., 148 AD3d 909, 912(followed)
- Matter of Anderson v City of New York, 237 AD3d 927, 928(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…