MISF, LLC v. Sohayegh

2025 NY Slip Op 03565 · Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department · June 11, 2025 · No. Index No. 608367/22

Summary

The Appellate Division, Second Department reviewed an appeal from a trial court order denying summary judgment on a conversion claim brought by MISF, LLC against a former member. The court dismissed the appeals of individual plaintiffs who were not aggrieved by the order and affirmed the denial of summary judgment, holding that MISF failed to establish prima facie that the defendant's wire transfers were unauthorized. Costs were awarded to the defendant.

Court
Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Writing for the Court
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS, J.P.; PAUL WOOTEN; HELEN VOUTSINAS; LAURENCE L. LOVE, JJ.
Jurisdiction
New York
Decision date
June 11, 2025
Docket number
Index No. 608367/22
Procedural posture
Appeal from order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County denying summary judgment on conversion claim against Sion Sohayegh.
Precedential value
published
Parties
MISF, LLC, et al. v. Sion Sohayegh, et al.
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

conversionsummary judgmentcivil proceduretorts

Practice areas

civil proceduretortscommercial litigation

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the trial court properly denied summary judgment on the conversion claim against Sion Sohayegh.

Holdings

  1. The Appellate Division affirmed the denial of summary judgment, holding that MISF failed to establish a prima facie case that the transfer was unauthorized.

Key quotations

To establish a cause of action to recover damages for conversion, a plaintiff must show legal ownership or an immediate superior right of possession to a specific identifiable thing and must show that the defendant exercised an unauthorized dominion over the thing in question to the exclusion of the plaintiff's rights
A claim of conversion of money is proper when funds designated for a particular purpose are used for an unauthorized purpose

Factual background

MISF, LLC alleged that its member, Sion Sohayegh, transferred funds from MISF's bank account to the escrow account of Price Law Firm without authorization, constituting conversion. MISF moved for summary judgment on the conversion claim, which the trial court denied.

Procedural history

The Supreme Court, Suffolk County denied MISF's motion for summary judgment on the conversion claim. MISF appealed; the Appellate Division affirmed the denial.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…