People v. Foy

2025 NY Slip Op 02795 · Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department · May 7, 2025 · No. Ind. No. 38/21

Summary

This Appellate Division, Second Department decision affirms the defendant's conviction for attempted assault in the first degree following a guilty plea. The court addresses several appellate challenges, concluding that the defendant's objections to the validity of his plea and a Sandoval ruling were unpreserved or foreclosed by his guilty plea. Additionally, the court finds that the defendant validly waived his right to appeal, thereby precluding review of his suppression challenge.

Court
Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Writing for the Court
MARK C. DILLON, J.P.; CHERYL E. CHAMBERS; LOURDES M. VENTURA; JAMES P. MCCORMACK, JJ.
Jurisdiction
New York
Decision date
May 7, 2025
Docket number
Ind. No. 38/21
Procedural posture
Appeal from judgment of the County Court, Westchester County convicting appellant of attempted assault in the first degree and imposing sentence.
Precedential value
published
Parties
Perry Foy v. The People of the State of New York
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

criminal procedureappellate procedureevidenceplea bargainingappellate jurisdiction

Practice areas

criminal procedure

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the defendant's challenge to the validity of his guilty plea is preserved for appellate review.
  2. Whether the defendant validly waived his right to appeal.
  3. Whether the suppression determination is reviewable given the waiver and withdrawal of motions.

Holdings

  1. The challenge is unpreserved for appellate review.
  2. The defendant validly waived his right to appeal.
  3. Appellate review of the suppression determination is precluded by the valid waiver and the condition of the plea.

Key quotations

The defendant's challenge to the validity of his plea of guilty is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v. Bellamy, 235 AD3d 994, 994; People v. Myke, 232 AD3d 913). (994)
Appellate review of the defendant's challenge to the County Court's suppression determination is precluded by his valid appeal waiver (see People v. Hightower-Castro, 219 AD3d 504, 505) and was waived by the defendant withdrawing his motions as a condition of his plea of guilty (see People v. Cabot, 210 AD3d 902). (505)

Factual background

Perry Foy pleaded guilty to attempted assault in the first degree in Westchester County Court, was sentenced, and subsequently appealed asserting that his plea was not valid, that he had not knowingly waived his right to appeal, and that the trial court's suppression ruling should be reviewed.

Procedural history

Defendant pleaded guilty to attempted assault in the first degree; County Court sentenced; appellant appealed challenging the validity of his guilty plea, his waiver of the right to appeal, and the suppression determination.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…