People v. Kiarie

2025 NY Slip Op 04663 · Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department · August 13, 2025 · No. Ind. No. 14-00779

Summary

This Appellate Division, Second Department decision addresses an appellant's pro se application for a writ of error coram nobis seeking to vacate a prior affirmance of a Westchester County Supreme Court judgment. The appellant claimed ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. The court denied the application, finding that the appellant failed to establish a denial of effective assistance under applicable precedent.

Court
Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Writing for the Court
MARK C. DILLON, J.P.; ANGELA G. IANNACCI; LINDA CHRISTOPHER; PAUL WOOTEN, JJ.
Jurisdiction
New York
Decision date
August 13, 2025
Docket number
Ind. No. 14-00779
Procedural posture
Application for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate the Appellate Division's October 13, 2021 decision affirming a Westchester County Supreme Court judgment.
Precedential value
Published
Parties
Kamau Kiarie v. People of the State of New York
Disposition
writ_denied

Topics

criminal procedureappellate jurisdictionstandard of review

Practice areas

criminal procedure

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the appellant demonstrated ineffective assistance of appellate counsel sufficient to obtain a writ of error coram nobis.

Holdings

  1. The application is denied because the appellant failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel.

Key quotations

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v. Barnes, 463 U.S. 745; People v. Stultz, 2 N.Y.3d 277).

Factual background

Kamau Kiarie was convicted in Westchester County and appealed. The Appellate Division affirmed the conviction. Kiarie now alleges that his appellate counsel was ineffective and seeks to vacate the judgment.

Procedural history

The Westchester County Supreme Court entered a judgment on December 2, 2015. The Appellate Division, Second Department affirmed that judgment on October 13, 2021. The appellant now seeks relief on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…