People v. Ramirez

2025 NY Slip Op 01392 · Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department · March 12, 2025 · No. 2019-12371 ON MOTION

Summary

This Appellate Division decision addresses a defendant's appeal from a Queens County Supreme Court judgment convicting him of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol. The court granted the motion of originally assigned counsel to withdraw under Anders v. California, finding her submitted brief deficient for failing to adequately identify nonfrivolous appellate issues or analyze potential grounds for appeal. Consequently, the court assigned new counsel through The Legal Aid Society and directed both parties to file briefs within specified timeframes.

Court
Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Writing for the Court
Colleen D. Duffy, J.P.; Paul Wooten; Carl J. Landicino; James P. McCormack, JJ.
Jurisdiction
New York
Decision date
March 12, 2025
Docket number
2019-12371 ON MOTION
Procedural posture
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County convicting the appellant of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol.
Precedential value
published
Parties
Benjamin Ramirez v. People of the State of New York
Disposition
other

Topics

appellate procedureappellate jurisdictioncriminal procedurestandard of review

Practice areas

criminal procedureappellate procedure

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the appellate court must assign new counsel because the Anders brief is deficient
  2. Whether the motion to withdraw counsel should be granted

Holdings

  1. The court ordered that new counsel be assigned because the brief submitted under Anders v. California failed to adequately highlight the record and identify appellate issues.

Key quotations

Step one requires the appellate court to perform "[an] evaluation of assigned counsel's brief, which must, to be adequate, discuss 'relevant evidence, with specific references to the record; identify and assess the efficacy of any significant objections, applications, or motions; and identify possible issues for appeal, with reference to the facts of the case and relevant legal authority'" (id. at 232, quoting Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252, 258). (at 232)

Factual background

Benjamin Ramirez pleaded guilty to operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol and was sentenced in Queens County. Assigned counsel submitted an Anders brief that the Appellate Division found deficient for failing to identify non‑frivolous issues and to adequately discuss the record.

Procedural history

The Supreme Court, Queens County entered a conviction and sentence on October 1, 2019. Assigned counsel filed an Anders brief. The Appellate Division reviewed the brief, found it deficient, and ordered new counsel be appointed and the motion to withdraw counsel granted.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…