People v. Yarbrough

2025 NY Slip Op 00118 · Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department · January 8, 2025 · No. 2016-11608

Summary

The Appellate Division, Second Department reversed the defendant's murder and weapons possession convictions and remanded the case for a new trial. The court determined that the defendant's appellate claims were identical to those successfully raised by his jointly tried codefendant in People v. Deverow. Accordingly, the judgment was reversed on the law without addressing the defendant's remaining contentions.

Court
Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Writing for the Court
Barros, J.P.; Dowling, J.; Ventura, J.; McCormack, J.J.
Jurisdiction
New York
Decision date
January 8, 2025
Docket number
2016-11608
Procedural posture
Appeal from judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County convicting appellant of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree.
Precedential value
published
Parties
Jamane Yarbrough v. People of the State of New York
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded

Topics

appellate procedurecriminal procedurestandard of review

Practice areas

criminal procedure

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the appellate court should reverse the conviction on the same legal grounds that warranted reversal of the codefendant’s conviction.

Holdings

  1. The judgment of conviction is reversed and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for a new trial.

Key quotations

ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, on the law, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for a new trial. (at end of opinion)

Factual background

Jamane Yarbrough was convicted of second‑degree murder and second‑degree criminal possession of a weapon after a jury trial. A codefendant was also convicted, and the People conceded that the codefendant’s conviction was reversed on legal grounds that apply to Yarbrough’s case.

Procedural history

The defendant was convicted by a jury in the Supreme Court, Queens County. The People conceded that the judgment must be reversed based on precedent that reversed the codefendant's conviction. The defendant raised identical claims to those raised on the codefendant's appeal.

Remand instructions

Remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for a new trial.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…