Matter of A. DD. v. B. EE.

2025 NY Slip Op 02826 (Appellate Division Third Department 2025) · Appellate Division, Third Department · May 8, 2025 · No. CV-23-1337

Summary

This Appellate Division, Third Department decision reviews a Family Court order granting sole legal and residential custody to the mother and finding the father committed a family offense. The court affirms the lower court's determination, deferring to its factual findings and credibility assessments regarding the parents' communication difficulties and the father's abusive conduct. The opinion also addresses arguments regarding mootness, evidentiary rulings, and claims of judicial bias.

Court
Appellate Division, Third Department
Writing for the Court
Mackey, J.; Garry, P.J.; Egan Jr.; Reynolds Fitzgerald; McShan, JJ.
Jurisdiction
New York
Decision date
May 8, 2025
Docket number
CV-23-1337
Procedural posture
Appeal from Family Court of Otsego County order granting mother sole legal and residential custody and finding father committed a family offense.
Standard of review
deferential review – family court findings reviewed for sound and substantial basis
Precedential value
published
Parties
B. EE. v. A. DD.
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

child custodyfamily law procedureappellate procedurestandard of reviewfamily law

Practice areas

family law

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the appellate court may affirm the Family Court’s custody determination under a deferential standard.
  2. Whether the family‑offense finding is appealable as a nondispositional order without permission to appeal.

Holdings

  1. The appellate court affirms the Family Court’s custody order because the findings are supported by a sound and substantial basis in the record.
  2. The family‑offense finding is not appealable because the order was nondispositional and the father did not seek permission to appeal.

Key quotations

"the paramount consideration in an initial custody determination is the best interests of the child[ren]"
"but for very limited circumstances involving abuse or neglect, no appeal lies as of right from a nondispositional order of Family Court"

Factual background

The parents are married but separated and have two children born in 2011 and 2013. The mother filed a custody petition and a family offense petition alleging harassment by the father. After a fact‑finding hearing, the Family Court awarded the mother sole legal and residential custody, granted the father liberal telephone contact and reasonable parenting time, and found the father had committed harassment in the second degree.

Procedural history

Family Court entered an order on June 20, 2023 granting the mother sole custody and finding the father liable for a family offense. The parties entered a consent modification in August 2023. The father appealed the custody determination and the family offense finding.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…