Matter of Kingston V. (Javon V.)

Kingston V., 2025 NY Slip Op 00126 (Appellate Division Third Department 2025) · Appellate Division, Third Department · January 9, 2025 · No. CV-23-0126

Summary

This New York Appellate Division decision reviews a Family Court order adjudicating a child as neglected based on the father's conduct and history. The court affirmed the neglect finding, citing the father's prior criminal convictions, untreated anger issues, refusal to participate in mandated programming, and specific incidents demonstrating a failure to exercise a minimum degree of care. The appellate court concluded that the record provided a sound and substantial basis for the lower court's credibility determinations and factual findings regarding imminent risk to the child.

Court
Appellate Division, Third Department
Writing for the Court
Clark, J.P.; Lynch, JJ.; Reynolds Fitzgerald, JJ.; Ceresia, JJ.; Powers, JJ.
Jurisdiction
New York
Decision date
January 9, 2025
Docket number
CV-23-0126
Procedural posture
Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Clinton County granting a petition to adjudicate the child as neglected.
Standard of review
Substantial evidence / sound and substantial basis standard for factual findings.
Precedential value
published
Parties
Javon V. v. Clinton County Department of Social Services
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

family law procedurefamily lawdomestic violence

Practice areas

family law

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the Family Court's finding of neglect was supported by a sound and substantial basis in the record.
  2. Whether the father failed to exercise a minimum degree of care as required by the Family Court Act.

Holdings

  1. The appellate court affirmed the Family Court's finding of neglect, concluding that the record provides a sound and substantial basis for the determination.
  2. The father failed to exercise a minimum degree of care, satisfying the statutory elements of neglect.

Key quotations

A party seeking to establish neglect must show, by a preponderance of the evidence, first, that a child's physical, mental or emotional condition has been impaired or is in imminent danger of becoming impaired and second, that the actual or threatened harm to the child is a consequence of the failure of the parent or caretaker to exercise a minimum degree of care in providing the child with proper supervision or guardianship.
Family Court's factual findings and credibility determinations are accorded great weight in such a proceeding and will not be disturbed on appeal unless they lack a sound and substantial basis in the record.

Factual background

The father had a prior neglect finding from a 2007 incident involving assault on the child's maternal grandfather. He later displayed uncontrolled anger, took the child from the paternal grandmother’s care, and threatened caseworkers. The mother also had a neglect finding. Both parents were placed on probation/parole and had histories of domestic violence.

Procedural history

The Family Court found both parents had neglected the child and placed the child in foster care with the petitioner. The father appealed the neglect finding.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…