Matter of Michelle EE. v. John EE.

2025 NY Slip Op 01019 · Appellate Division, Third Department · February 20, 2025 · No. CV-23-1228

Summary

The Appellate Division, Third Department reviewed a Family Court order modifying a prior custody and visitation arrangement between the parents of three children. The court affirmed the lower court's decision, concluding that the evidence established a sufficient change in circumstances and that the modified parenting schedule was in the best interests of the children. The father's appeal was dismissed without costs.

Court
Appellate Division, Third Department
Writing for the Court
Egan Jr., J.P.; Clark, Reynolds Fitzgerald; Fisher; Mackey, J.
Jurisdiction
New York
Decision date
February 20, 2025
Docket number
CV-23-1228
Procedural posture
Appeal from Family Court of Broome County order (June 26, 2023) that partially granted a petition to modify custody and visitation.
Standard of review
abuse of discretion
Precedential value
published
Parties
John EE. v. Michelle EE.
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

child custodyfamily law procedurefamily law

Practice areas

family law

Questions Presented

  1. Whether a sufficient change in circumstances occurred to warrant modification of the custody arrangement
  2. Whether the Family Court’s parenting schedule was within its broad discretion and entitled to deference

Holdings

  1. The record supports a finding that a change in circumstances occurred, justifying modification of the custody and visitation schedule.
  2. The Family Court’s parenting schedule is well within its broad discretion and is entitled to great deference.

Key quotations

Family Court has broad discretion in fashioning a parenting schedule that is in the best interests of the children, and it is well settled that the court's findings in this regard are entitled to great deference unless they lack a sound and substantial basis in the record. (at 175 AD3d 1625)
We find that the modified arrangement was well within the court's broad discretion in fashioning a parenting schedule that is in the best interests of the children. (at 186 AD3d 950)

Factual background

The parents are the mother (petitioner) and father (respondent) of three children born in 2006, 2008, and 2012. A 2020 order gave the father sole custody with limited parenting time to the mother. In 2021 the mother’s parenting time was expanded. In 2022 the mother sought joint custody and further increased time. The Family Court held that a change in circumstances existed and modified the schedule to give the mother alternate weekends, equal school breaks, and shared holidays.

Procedural history

Family Court modified a prior custody order, granting the father sole custody but expanding the mother’s parenting time. The father appealed the modification.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…