Pangea Capital Management, LLC v. John R. Lakian

2019 NY Slip Op 04745 (N.Y. 2019) (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019) · New York Court of Appeals · June 25, 2019 · No. No. 53

Summary

The New York Court of Appeals answered in the negative a certified question from the Second Circuit concerning whether a spouse’s equitable-distribution interest in real property is subject to attachment by a later judgment creditor when the divorce judgment was not docketed in the county where the property is located. The Court held that an entered divorce judgment distributing marital property does not make the former spouse a judgment creditor, so the docketing priority rules of CPLR 5203 did not apply. The Court did not answer the second certified question.

Holdings

  1. An entered judgment of divorce that equitably distributes marital property does not transform one former spouse into a judgment creditor of the other. Accordingly, the spouse's interest is not subject to attachment priority under CPLR 5203(a) merely because the divorce judgment was not docketed in the county where the property is located.
  2. CPLR 5203(c) addresses priority against a judicial lien created by the filing of a bankruptcy petition and does not apply to the nonbankruptcy dispute between Pangea and Andrea.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether a spouse whose interest in real property is established by an entered judgment of divorce under Domestic Relations Law § 236 becomes a judgment creditor subject to the docketing and priority provisions of CPLR 5203 when the spouse does not docket the divorce judgment in the county where the property is located.
  2. Whether CPLR 5203(c), enacted in response to Musso v. Ostashko, applies outside the context of a bankruptcy petition.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (14)

  • Pangea Capital Mgmt., LLC v. Lakian, 906 F.3d 1 (2d Cir. 2018)(followed procedurally)
  • Pangea Capital Mgmt., LLC v. Lakian, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 149278 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 13, 2017) (No. 16-cv-0840 (LAK))(followed)
  • McDermott v. McDermott, 119 A.D.2d 370 (2d Dep't 1986)(followed)
  • Kaplan v. Kaplan, 82 N.Y.2d 300 (1993)(followed)
  • O'Brien v. O'Brien, 66 N.Y.2d 576 (1985)(followed)
  • Majauskas v. Majauskas, 61 N.Y.2d 481 (1984)(followed)
  • Musso v. Ostashko, 468 F.3d 99 (2d Cir. 2006)(distinguished_from)
  • Darling v. Darling, 22 Misc. 3d 343 (Sup. Ct. Kings County 2008)(followed)
  • Rodriguez v. Sepe, 29 Misc. 3d 1011 (Sup. Ct. Westchester County 2010)(followed)
  • Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. v. Makowska, 999 F. Supp. 2d 459 (S.D.N.Y. 2014)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 14.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…