Summary
The Appellate Division, First Department dismissed the plaintiffs’ appeal from an order imposing $250 in sanctions against plaintiff Frederick S. Koger as abandoned because the plaintiffs did not address the order’s merits. The court stated that, alternatively, the sanctions were within the trial court’s discretion because the plaintiffs violated a protective order, and it declined to impose additional sanctions.
Holdings
- An appeal is deemed abandoned when the appellants do not address the merits of the order under review or the sanctions it imposed; plaintiffs' appeal was therefore dismissed as abandoned.
Questions Presented
- Whether plaintiffs' appeal from the sanctions order should be dismissed as abandoned when plaintiffs failed to address the merits of the order or the sanctions imposed.
- Whether the lower court acted within its discretion in imposing sanctions for violating a protective order.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (3)
- Altschuler v Jobman 478/480, LLC, 135 AD3d 439, 441 [1st Dept 2016], lv denied 29 NY3d 903 [2017](followed)
- De Luca v De Luca, 241 AD3d 1146, 1149 [1st Dept 2025](followed)
- Solomon v 360 E. 72d St. Owners Inc., 244 AD3d 461, 462-463 [1st Dept 2025](followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…