Summary
The Appellate Division, First Department, affirmed orders extinguishing Centennial Elevator Industries Inc.'s mechanic's lien and exonerating the bond securing it. The court held that Centennial was not entitled to substitution of counsel or vacatur of its default because it failed to provide a reasonable excuse for not appearing, and the lien had expired by operation of law when Centennial failed to foreclose or obtain an extension within one year.
Holdings
- Centennial was not entitled to a stay of the proceedings or substitution of counsel under CPLR 321(c) because its outside counsel died before commencement of the proceeding and therefore had never appeared in the action.
- Supreme Court properly denied vacatur of Centennial's default because Centennial failed to provide a reasonable excuse for not appearing or requesting an adjournment before the response deadline.
- The mechanic's lien expired by operation of law because Centennial neither commenced a foreclosure action nor filed an extension within one year, and a lienor may not foreclose on or extend an expired lien.
- Vacatur or extinguishment of the lien and exoneration of the bond were appropriate because Centennial defaulted without a reasonable excuse and the lien had expired by operation of law.
Questions Presented
- Whether Centennial was entitled to a stay of the proceedings and substitution of counsel under CPLR 321(c) because its outside counsel had died before commencement of the proceeding.
- Whether Centennial established a reasonable excuse warranting vacatur of its default.
- Whether Centennial could foreclose on or extend the mechanic's lien after the one-year statutory period had expired.
- Whether extinguishment of the lien and exoneration of the bond were proper.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (10)
- Finnegan v NFT-Metro Bus Sys., 101 AD2d 1010, 1010-1011 [4th Dept 1984], affd 63 NY2d 1018 [1984](followed)
- SOS Capital v Recycling Paper Partners of PA, LLC, 220 AD3d 25, 38 [1st Dept 2023](followed)
- Goldman v Cotter, 10 AD3d 289, 291 [1st Dept 2004](followed)
- Forest Walnut LLC v Abizker, 224 AD3d 408, 409 [1st Dept 2024](followed)
- U.S. Bank N.A. v Wei Feng Zhu, 238 AD3d 628, 629 [1st Dept 2025](followed)
- Carmody v 208-210 E. 31st Realty, LLC, 135 AD3d 491 [1st Dept 2016](followed)
- Noce v Kaufman, 2 NY2d 347, 351 [1957](followed)
- 240-35 Assoc. v Major Bldrs. Corp., 234 AD2d 234, 234 [1st Dept 1996](followed)
- JDS Constr. Group LLC v Copper Servs., LLC, 247 AD3d 412, 413 [1st Dept 2026](followed)
- Matter of Flintlock Realty & Constr. Corp. [Grawer Bear Constr. Corp.], 188 AD2d 532, 533 [2d Dept 1992](followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.