Summary
The Appellate Division, Fourth Department, affirmed a Family Court order modifying the parties' prior custody arrangement. The court held that the record provided a sound and substantial basis for granting the father primary physical residency for educational purposes and reducing the mother's parenting time during the school year.
Holdings
- Because the parties did not dispute that a change in circumstances sufficient to warrant an inquiry into the child's best interests had occurred, modification of the prior custody order was properly considered.
- Family Court's determination that it was in the child's best interests to modify the custody arrangement, granting the father primary physical residency for educational purposes and school-night residency during the school year, had a sound and substantial basis in the record.
- The Appellate Division would not disturb Family Court's custody determination because it was based on an evidentiary hearing and had an evidentiary basis in the record.
Questions Presented
- Whether Family Court properly modified the prior custody order after the parties alleged a change in circumstances.
- Whether the record provided a sound and substantial basis for determining that the modified custody arrangement was in the child's best interests.
- Whether the Appellate Division should disturb Family Court's custody determination based on the evidentiary record.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (5)
- Matter of Cooley v Roloson, 201 AD3d 1299, 1299-1300 [4th Dept 2022](followed)
- Matter of Muriel v Muriel, 179 AD3d 1529, 1529 [4th Dept 2020](followed)
- Matter of Nordee v Nordee, 170 AD3d 1636, 1636-1637 [4th Dept 2019], lv denied 33 NY3d 909 [2019](followed)
- Matter of Warren v Miller, 132 AD3d 1352, 1354 [4th Dept 2015](followed)
- Matter of Verne v Hamilton, 191 AD3d 1433, 1434 [4th Dept 2021](followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…