Summary
The New York Appellate Division, Second Department, affirmed a judgment of divorce awarding the plaintiff maintenance of $452.13 per month for three years. The court also upheld the denial of the defendant's requested credit for $75,000 in alleged marital loans, finding insufficient evidence that the loans constituted marital debt.
Holdings
- The award of maintenance to plaintiff in the amount of $452.13 per month for three years was a provident exercise of the trial court's discretion.
- The trial court providently exercised its discretion by imputing only $32,500 in income to plaintiff for purposes of calculating defendant's maintenance obligation, notwithstanding defendant's consent to that imputation solely for child-support purposes.
- The trial court properly declined to treat the alleged $75,000 in loans as marital debt and therefore properly denied defendant a credit for them.
Questions Presented
- Whether the trial court providently exercised its discretion in awarding plaintiff maintenance of $452.13 per month for three years.
- Whether the trial court properly imputed $32,500 in income to plaintiff for purposes of calculating defendant's maintenance obligation.
- Whether the trial court properly declined to treat alleged loans totaling $75,000 as marital debt and award defendant a corresponding credit.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (15)
- Diliberto v Diliberto, 230 AD3d 637, 640(followed)
- Sansone v Sansone, 144 AD3d 885, 886(followed)
- Varnit v Varnit, 233 AD3d 917, 921(followed)
- Bari v Bari, 200 AD3d 835, 837(followed)
- Albano v Albano, 230 AD3d 723, 725(followed)
- Novick v Novick, 214 AD3d 995, 997(followed)
- Torkin v Susac, 236 AD3d 1082(followed)
- Bishop v Bishop, 230 AD3d 1212, 1213(followed)
- Tuchman v Tuchman, 201 AD3d 986, 990(followed)
- Sufia v Khalique, 189 AD3d 1499, 1502(followed)
Showing top 10 of 15.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…