Summary
The Appellate Division, First Department affirmed a Family Court order authorizing only agency-supervised visitation between the respondent father and his child. The court held that the determination was supported by a sound and substantial basis in the record, including concerns about the father's discipline of a child with significant special needs and his anger control.
Holdings
- Family Court properly determined that agency-supervised visitation served the child's best interests, and its determination had a sound and substantial basis in the record.
- To the extent the visitation determination rested on witness credibility and the father's character and temperament, Family Court's findings were entitled to the greatest respect.
Questions Presented
- Whether Family Court properly modified the prior visitation order to authorize agency-supervised visitation only.
- Whether the record provided an evidentiary basis for finding that unsupervised visitation would negatively affect the child's well-being.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (4)
- Linda R. v. Ari Z., 71 AD3d 465, 466 [1st Dept 2010](followed)
- Matter of Frank M. v Donna W., 44 AD3d 495 [1st Dept 2007](followed)
- Matter of Irene O., 38 NY2d 776, 777 [1975](followed)
- Matter of Elissa A. v Samuel B., 123 AD3d 638, 639 [1st Dept 2014](followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…