Summary
The Appellate Division, First Department, reversed the denial of the New York City Housing Authority's motion for summary judgment in a premises-liability action involving a cardboard box near a walkway. The court held that the Authority established lack of notice and a reasonable cleaning routine, and that the plaintiff failed to show the routine was manifestly unreasonable or that the Authority had notice of the specific hazard.
Holdings
- Defendant was entitled to summary judgment because it established that it lacked notice of the cardboard box before plaintiff's accident, and plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact.
- Defendant's twice-daily cleaning schedule was not shown to be manifestly unreasonable, and defendant was not required to patrol the area continuously.
Questions Presented
- Whether defendant was entitled to summary judgment because it lacked actual or constructive notice of the cardboard box that allegedly caused plaintiff's fall.
- Whether defendant's twice-daily cleaning routine was reasonable or manifestly unreasonable under the circumstances.
Disposition
reversed
Cases Cited (5)
- Velocci v Stop & Shop, 188 AD3d 436, 439 [1st Dept 2020](followed)
- Rivera v 2160 Realty Co., L.L.C., 4 NY3d 837, 838 [2005](followed)
- Pagan v New York City Hous. Auth., 121 AD3d 622, 623 [1st Dept 2014](followed)
- Beras v New York City Hous. Auth., 118 AD3d 584, 584 [1st Dept 2014](followed)
- Vasquez v Nealco Towers LLC, 160 AD3d 496 [1st Dept 2018](followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…