Summary
The Appellate Division, Fourth Department affirmed an order revoking a suspended judgment and terminating the respondent mother's parental rights. The court held that the petitioner proved by a preponderance of the evidence that the mother violated the suspended judgment's conditions and that termination was in the child's best interests.
Holdings
- The petitioner established by a preponderance of the evidence that the mother violated the terms and conditions of the suspended judgment.
- A hearing on a petition alleging violation of a suspended judgment is part of the dispositional phase of a permanent-neglect proceeding, and the disposition must be based on the best interests of the child.
- The record supported the Family Court's determination that termination of the mother's parental rights was in the child's best interests.
Questions Presented
- Whether the petitioner established by a preponderance of the evidence that the mother violated the terms and conditions of the suspended judgment.
- Whether termination of the mother's parental rights was in the child's best interests after revocation of the suspended judgment.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (4)
- Matter of Giovanni K. [Dawn K.], 68 A.D.3d 1766, 1767 (N.Y. App. Div. 4th Dep't 2009), lv. denied, 14 N.Y.3d 707 (2010)(followed)
- Matter of Baron C. [Dominique C.], 101 A.D.3d 1622, 1622 (N.Y. App. Div. 4th Dep't 2012)(followed)
- Matter of Richelis S. [Richard S.], 68 A.D.3d 1643, 1644-45 (N.Y. App. Div. 4th Dep't 2009), appeal dismissed, 14 N.Y.3d 767 (2010)(followed)
- Matter of Mercedes L., 12 A.D.3d 1184, 1184 (N.Y. App. Div. 4th Dep't 2004)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…