Summary
The Appellate Division reversed a judgment granting a petition to annul the New York State Public High School Athletic Association's denial of an application to extend athletic eligibility. The court held that the Association's determination had a rational basis and was not arbitrary, capricious, or an abuse of discretion because the petitioner had not shown that circumstances beyond his control prevented participation.
Holdings
- The appeal was not moot because the issue presented was of public importance, concerned a matter of public interest, and was likely to recur.
- The Association's determination was rational and was not arbitrary, capricious, or an abuse of discretion.
Questions Presented
- Whether the appeal was moot after the petitioner graduated and the school year for which extended eligibility was sought had passed.
- Whether the Association's denial of the application for extended athletic eligibility was arbitrary, capricious, or an abuse of discretion.
Disposition
reversed
Cases Cited (2)
- Matter of Gerard v Section III of N.Y. State Pub. High School Athletic Assn., 210 A.D.2d 938 (4th Dep't 1994)(followed)
- Pratt v New York Pub. High School Athletic Assn., 133 Misc. 2d 679 (Sup. Ct. 1986)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…