Summary
The Appellate Division, Fourth Department, affirmed an order adjudging the respondent mother to have neglected the subject child in a Family Court Act article 10 proceeding. The court held that the mother's argument for dismissal under Family Court Act § 1051(c) was unpreserved because she had not moved for that relief and, in any event, lacked merit.
Holdings
- The mother's contention was not preserved for appellate review because she never moved for dismissal under Family Court Act § 1051(c).
- Even if the contention had been preserved, it was without merit.
Questions Presented
- Whether the mother's contention that the neglect petition should have been dismissed under Family Court Act § 1051(c) was preserved for appellate review.
- If preserved, whether the contention had merit.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (2)
- Matter of Malachi H. [Dequisa H.], 125 AD3d 478, 478 (1st Dept 2015)(followed)
- Matter of Josee Louise L.H. [DeCarla L.], 121 AD3d 492, 493 (1st Dept 2014), lv denied 24 NY3d 913 (2015)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…