Summary
The Appellate Division, Fourth Department affirmed orders granting an order of protection and finding that the respondent willfully violated a custody order. The court upheld supervised visitation, concluding that the father established the family offense and custody-order violation and that supervised visitation was supported by the record and the child's best interests.
Holdings
- The father established by a preponderance of the evidence that the mother committed aggravated harassment in the second degree, and the Family Court's credibility determinations were supported by the record.
- The father established by clear and convincing evidence that the mother willfully violated the custody order by failing to notify him of the child's medical issues as soon as reasonably possible.
- The Family Court properly directed that the mother's visitation be supervised because the record provided a sound and substantial basis for finding that supervised visitation was in the child's best interests.
Questions Presented
- Whether the father established by a preponderance of the evidence that the mother committed aggravated harassment in the second degree.
- Whether the father established by clear and convincing evidence that the mother willfully violated the custody order by failing to timely notify him of the child's medical issues.
- Whether the Family Court properly directed that the mother's visitation with the child be supervised.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (11)
- Matter of Clausell v Salame, 156 AD3d 1401, 1402 [4th Dept 2017](followed)
- Matter of Parameswar v Parameswar, 109 AD3d 473, 474 [2d Dept 2013](followed)
- Matter of Danielle S. v Larry R.S., 41 AD3d 1188, 1189 [4th Dept 2007](followed)
- Matter of Martin v Flynn, 133 AD3d 1369, 1370 [4th Dept 2015](followed)
- Matter of Tarrant v Ostrowski, 96 AD3d 1580, 1580-1581 [4th Dept 2012], lv denied 20 NY3d 855 [2013](followed)
- Matter of Palazzolo v Giresi-Palazzolo, 138 AD3d 866, 867 [2d Dept 2016](followed)
- Matter of Wojcik v Newton [appeal No. 2], 11 AD3d 1011, 1012 [4th Dept 2004](followed)
- Matter of Chilbert v Soler, 77 AD3d 1405, 1406 [4th Dept 2010], lv denied 16 NY3d 701 [2011](followed)
- Matter of Talbot v Edick, 159 AD3d 1406, 1407 [4th Dept 2018](followed)
- Matter of Watson v Maragh, 156 AD3d 801, 802-803 [2d Dept 2017](followed)
Showing top 10 of 11.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…