Summary
The Appellate Division, Second Department affirmed an order denying Yonkers Racing Corp.'s second motion for leave to renew its prior summary judgment motion. The court held that the affidavits submitted did not present new facts that would change the prior determination and that the defendant lacked a reasonable justification for not presenting them earlier.
Holdings
- Leave to renew was properly denied because the affidavits submitted with the second renewal motion did not present new facts that would change the prior determination, and the defendant failed to provide a reasonable justification for not presenting them on its original motion.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Supreme Court properly denied Yonkers Racing Corp.'s second motion for leave to renew portions of its prior summary judgment motion.
- Whether the affidavits submitted with the second renewal motion constituted new facts that would change the prior determination and whether Yonkers reasonably justified its failure to submit them earlier.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (3)
- Seegopaul v MTA Bus Co., 210 AD3d 715, 716(followed)
- Dupree v Westchester County Health Care Corp., 164 AD3d 1211, 1214(followed)
- Waterfall Victoria Grantor Trust II, Series G v Philantrope, 211 AD3d 986, 987-988(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…