Davis v. Harrah's Cherokee Casino, 362 N.C. 133

655 S.E.2d 392 (2008) · Supreme Court of North Carolina · January 25, 2008 · No. No. 456A06

Summary

The Supreme Court of North Carolina affirmed an award of workers' compensation benefits to William Davis for ongoing disability and medical treatment following a workplace back injury. The court held that competent evidence supported the Industrial Commission's findings that the original injury and first surgery caused degenerative changes, the subsequent surgery, and continuing disability. It also held that analysis of an intervening cause was unnecessary because the Commission properly found that the later treatment and disability resulted directly from the original compensable injury.

Holdings

  1. Competent evidence supported the Commission's findings that Davis's first surgery made him more prone to degenerative changes and that the second surgery involved treatment of degenerative changes and scar tissue related to the original injury and first surgery.
  2. The Commission's findings supported its conclusions that the original compensable injury caused the second surgery, follow-up treatment, and ongoing disability, making the defendants responsible for the associated benefits.
  3. The Court did not need to decide the intervening-cause issue because the Commission properly found that the second surgery and ongoing disability resulted directly from the original compensable injury and first surgery.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether competent evidence supported the Industrial Commission's findings that Davis's second surgery and continuing disability were causally related to his original compensable work injury.
  2. Whether the Commission properly concluded that the defendants were responsible for medical treatment and disability benefits arising after Davis's fall at home.
  3. Whether the fall at home constituted an intervening causal event that broke the chain of causation.
  4. Whether the Court of Appeals properly applied the standard of review to the Commission's factual findings.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (8)

  • Adams v. AVX Corp., 349 N.C. 676, 680-81, 509 S.E.2d 411, 413-14 (1998)(followed)
  • Anderson v. Lincoln Constr. Co., 265 N.C. 431, 433-34, 144 S.E.2d 272, 274 (1965)(followed)
  • Jones v. Myrtle Desk Co., 264 N.C. 401, 402, 141 S.E.2d 632, 633 (1965) (per curiam)(followed)
  • Deese v. Champion Int'l Corp., 352 N.C. 109, 115, 530 S.E.2d 549, 553 (2000)(followed)
  • Clark v. Wal-Mart, 360 N.C. 41, 43, 619 S.E.2d 491, 492 (2005)(followed)
  • Hendrix v. Linn-Corriher Corp., 317 N.C. 179, 186, 345 S.E.2d 374, 379 (1986)(followed)
  • Horne v. Universal Leaf Tobacco Processors, 119 N.C. App. 682, 459 S.E.2d 797, disc. rev. denied, 342 N.C. 192, 463 S.E.2d 237 (1995)(not reached)
  • Davis v. Harrah's Cherokee Casino, 178 N.C. App. 609, 632 S.E.2d 579 (2006)(affirmed in part and modified)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…