Summary
The Supreme Court of North Carolina held that conversations between a prisoner and his wife in public visiting areas of Department of Correction facilities were not confidential communications protected by North Carolina's marital communications privilege under N.C.G.S. § 8-57(c). The court concluded that the circumstances did not provide a reasonable expectation of privacy and reversed the Court of Appeals' decision ordering a new trial. The case was remanded for consideration of other assignments of error.
Holdings
- A confidential marital communication requires a reasonable expectation of privacy and an intent that the communication be kept secret. Relevant factors include the physical location of the communication and whether other individuals were present.
- Communications occurring during ordinary visits in public visiting areas of Department of Correction facilities are not confidential communications protected by N.C.G.S. § 8-57(c), because the incarcerated spouse has no reasonable expectation of privacy in those circumstances.
Questions Presented
- Whether conversations between a husband and wife in public visiting areas of Department of Correction facilities are confidential communications protected by N.C.G.S. § 8-57(c).
- Whether the trial court properly denied Rollins's motion to suppress the statements he made to his wife during the prison visits.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (17)
- Trammel v. United States, 445 U.S. 40 (1980)(followed for historical explanation)
- State v. Freeman, 302 N.C. 591, 276 S.E.2d 450 (1981)(followed)
- State v. Holmes, 330 N.C. 826, 412 S.E.2d 660 (1992)(followed)
- Hicks v. Hicks, 271 N.C. 204, 155 S.E.2d 799 (1967)(followed and distinguished)
- State v. Wiley, 355 N.C. 592, 565 S.E.2d 22 (2002)(followed)
- Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520 (1979)(followed for analogy)
- Hudson v. Palmer, 468 U.S. 517 (1984)(followed for analogy)
- United States v. Paul, 614 F.2d 115 (6th Cir. 1980)(followed for analogy)
- Lanza v. New York, 370 U.S. 139 (1962)(followed for analogy)
- Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539 (1974)(followed for analogy)
Showing top 10 of 17.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…