Summary
The North Dakota Supreme Court reviewed a judgment changing primary residential responsibility for a child from Paulette Albrecht to Shawn Neustel. The court held that the district court did not clearly err in finding a material change in circumstances, but its findings were insufficient to permit meaningful appellate review of whether the change was necessary to serve the child’s best interests. The judgment was affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for additional findings of fact.
Holdings
- The district court's finding that a material change in circumstances had occurred was not clearly erroneous.
- The district court's findings were insufficient to permit meaningful appellate review of whether changing primary residential responsibility was necessary to serve the child's best interests.
Questions Presented
- Whether the district court clearly erred in finding a material change in circumstances sufficient to permit modification of primary residential responsibility.
- Whether the district court made sufficiently specific findings that changing primary residential responsibility was necessary to serve the child's best interests.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (27)
- Lechler v. Lechler, 2010 ND 158, ¶ 9, 786 N.W.2d 733(followed)
- Frueh v. Frueh, 2009 ND 155, ¶ 8, 771 N.W.2d 593(followed)
- Siewert v. Siewert, 2008 ND 221, ¶¶ 17, 19, 758 N.W.2d 691(followed)
- Machart v. Machart, 2009 ND 208, ¶ 11, 776 N.W.2d 795(followed)
- Dunn v. Dunn, 2009 ND 193, ¶ 6, 775 N.W.2d 486(followed)
- Stanhope v. Phillips-Stanhope, 2008 ND 61, ¶ 6, 747 N.W.2d 79(followed)
- In re Thompson, 2003 ND 61, ¶ 7, 659 N.W.2d 864(followed)
- Haugrose v. Anderson, 2009 ND 81, ¶¶ 7, 9, 765 N.W.2d 677(followed)
- Fleck v. Fleck, 2010 ND 24, ¶ 6, 778 N.W.2d 572(followed)
- Dietz v. Dietz, 2007 ND 84, ¶ 13, 733 N.W.2d 225(followed)
Showing top 10 of 27.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…