Summary
The Supreme Court of North Dakota affirmed dismissal of Dr. Brian Gale's appeal from a disciplinary order issued by the North Dakota Board of Podiatric Medicine. The court held that Gale waived his right to challenge the Board's factual findings by stipulating that independent reviewers' findings would be binding and nonappealable. The disciplinary order revoked Gale's license, stayed revocation during a five-year probationary period, limited his practice to non-operative care, and imposed retraining and costs.
Holdings
- A party to an administrative proceeding may waive the right to an appeal, and a stipulation expressly providing that independent reviewers' factual findings are binding and nonappealable constitutes an effective waiver.
- Gale waived his right to challenge the Board members' findings of fact and related fact-finding procedures; the district court therefore properly dismissed his appeal from the Board's disciplinary order.
Questions Presented
- Whether Gale waived his right to challenge the Board's factual findings and the procedures used to reach those findings.
- Whether the district court properly dismissed Gale's appeal from the Board's disciplinary order.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (8)
- Gale v. North Dakota Board of Podiatric Medicine, 1997 ND 83, 562 N.W.2d 878(followed)
- Steen v. North Dakota Department of Human Services, 1997 ND 52, ¶ 35, 562 N.W.2d 83(followed)
- Stuart v. Stammen, 1999 ND 38, ¶ 12, 590 N.W.2d 224(followed)
- Diversified Financial Systems, Inc. v. Binstock, 1998 ND 61, ¶ 16, 575 N.W.2d 677(followed)
- Tormaschy v. Tormaschy, 1999 ND 131, ¶ 12, 596 N.W.2d 337(followed)
- Tormaschy v. Tormaschy, 1997 ND 2, ¶ 19, 559 N.W.2d 813(followed)
- Hanson v. Cincinnati Life Insurance Co., 1997 ND 230, ¶ 13, 571 N.W.2d 363(followed)
- Keator v. Gale, 1997 ND 46, 561 N.W.2d 286(mentioned)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…