Danni Jane Lynch, f/k/a Danni Jane Sweeney v. David James Sweeney

2007 ND 81 (N.D. 2007) · Supreme Court of North Dakota · June 7, 2007 · No. No. 20060104

Summary

The Supreme Court of North Dakota affirmed a district court’s award of $5,000 in attorney fees to a noncustodial parent in a child visitation dispute. The court held that although attorney fees were mandatory under N.D.C.C. § 14-09-24 for willful and persistent denial of visitation, the district court did not abuse its discretion in limiting the award because the request was insufficiently itemized and included fees for other issues.

Holdings

  1. When a court finds a custodial parent engaged in willful and persistent denial of visitation rights, N.D.C.C. § 14-09-24 requires an award of reasonable costs and attorney fees to the noncustodial parent.
  2. A district court's determination of the amount and reasonableness of attorney fees will not be reversed absent a clear abuse of discretion.
  3. A party seeking statutory attorney fees must provide sufficiently precise evidence identifying the fees attributable to the conduct for which fees are recoverable; the court is not required to search through undifferentiated billing records to make that allocation.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the district court abused its discretion by awarding $5,000 rather than the $49,470.45 in attorney fees requested by the noncustodial parent.
  2. Whether a noncustodial parent seeking mandatory fees under N.D.C.C. § 14-09-24 must provide evidence identifying the fees attributable to litigating the custodial parent's willful and persistent denial of visitation.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (10)

  • Sweeney v. Sweeney, 2002 ND 206, 654 N.W.2d 407(followed)
  • Sweeney v. Sweeney, 2005 ND 47, 693 N.W.2d 29(followed)
  • CybrCollect, Inc. v. North Dakota Department of Financial Institutions, 2005 ND 146, 703 N.W.2d 285(followed)
  • Gratech Co., Ltd. v. Wold Engineering, P.C., 2007 ND 46, 729 N.W.2d 326(followed)
  • City of Bismarck v. Thom, 261 N.W.2d 640 (N.D. 1977)(followed)
  • Gissel v. Kenmare Township, 512 N.W.2d 470 (N.D. 1994)(followed)
  • Whitmire v. Whitmire, 1999 ND 56, 591 N.W.2d 126(followed)
  • Peterson v. Zerr, 477 N.W.2d 230 (N.D. 1991)(followed)
  • T.F. James Co. v. Vakoch, 2001 ND 112, 628 N.W.2d 298(cited in dissent)
  • Holzer v. Jochim, 557 N.W.2d 57 (N.D. 1996)(cited in dissent)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…