Clyburn v. Clyburn

2025 Ohio 1759 · Court of Appeals of Ohio, Second Appellate District, Champaign County · May 16, 2025 · No. 2024-CA-34

Summary

This Ohio Court of Appeals opinion reviews a domestic relations court's division of marital property in a divorce case, specifically the award of a pet dog to one spouse. The appellant argued that the trial court failed to consider required statutory factors and that he should have received half the dog's value. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment, holding that the court did not abuse its discretion in awarding the dog based on daily care involvement, and found the appellant waived any claim regarding the dog's monetary value by failing to present evidence at trial.

Court
Court of Appeals of Ohio, Second Appellate District, Champaign County
Jurisdiction
Ohio
Decision date
May 16, 2025
Docket number
2024-CA-34
Procedural posture
Appeal from the Champaign County Domestic Relations Court judgment awarding the dog to the appellee.
Standard of review
abuse of discretion
Precedential value
published
Parties
Brandon Clyburn v. Megan M. Clyburn
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

divorceequitable distributionfamily law procedureappellate jurisdictionstandard of review

Practice areas

family law

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the trial court abused its discretion by not expressly addressing the statutory factors in awarding the dog.
  2. Whether the appellant may obtain half the value of the dog when the issue was not raised in the trial court and no evidence of value was presented.

Holdings

  1. The trial court did not abuse its discretion; the first assignment of error is overruled.
  2. The issue was not preserved for appeal; the second assignment of error is overruled.

Key quotations

While both parties loved Violet, Megan was more involved with her on a daily basis, and it found it more equitable to award the dog to her. (¶ 12)
It is settled law that issues raised for the first time on appeal and not having been raised in the trial court are not properly before this court and will not be addressed. (¶ 15)

Factual background

Brandon and Megan Clyburn married in 2018 and purchased a dog, Violet, during the marriage. Both cared for the dog, though only Brandon was listed on the license and Megan on the microchip. After separation in 2024, the parties attempted a shared‑custody arrangement that failed, and the trial court awarded Violet to Megan, finding she was more involved in daily care.

Procedural history

The trial court awarded the dog, Violet, to Megan Clyburn as marital property. Brandon Clyburn appealed, asserting the court failed to consider statutory factors and that he was entitled to half the dog’s value.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…

More from Ohio Court Of Appeals Of Ohio Second Appellate District Champaign County