Calicoat v. Conner

2025 Ohio 2252 · Court of Appeals of Ohio, Second Appellate District, Montgomery County · June 27, 2025 · No. 30365

Summary

This Ohio Court of Appeals opinion affirms a trial court's decision to deny a landlord's claim for damages against a former tenant following her vacating of a rental property. The appellate court notes that the appellant failed to comply with appellate briefing rules but proceeds to review the trial court's adoption of a magistrate's decision under an abuse-of-discretion standard. Finding no arbitrary or unreasonable actions by the trial court, which relied on insufficient evidence regarding repair costs and labor rates, the court upholds the lower court's judgment.

Court
Court of Appeals of Ohio, Second Appellate District, Montgomery County
Writing for the Court
Michael L. Tucker; Ronald C. Lewis; Mary K. Huffman
Jurisdiction
Ohio
Decision date
June 27, 2025
Docket number
30365
Procedural posture
Appeal from trial court judgment denying damages to landlord
Standard of review
abuse of discretion
Precedential value
published
Parties
Keith Calicoat v. Jessica Conner
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

appellate procedurestandard of reviewcivil procedure

Practice areas

civil procedure

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the trial court abused its discretion in adopting the magistrate’s decision denying damages to the landlord

Holdings

  1. The trial court did not abuse its discretion; its adoption of the magistrate’s decision was proper and the judgment denying damages is affirmed.

Key quotations

“Abuse of discretion” has been defined as an attitude that is unreasonable, arbitrary or unconscionable. (¶ 11)
When an appellate court reviews a trial court’s adoption of a magistrate’s report for an abuse of discretion, such a determination will only be reversed where it appears that the trial court’s actions were arbitrary or unreasonable. (¶ 11)

Factual background

Keith Calicoat leased a residential unit to Jessica Conner for one year, collected a $1,130 security deposit, and later sued her for $3,983.16 in alleged damages and cleaning costs. Calicoat claimed he performed repairs and cleaning at $125 per hour through his LLC but offered no receipts or timesheets. Conner disputed the costs and said the deposit should cover any damage. The magistrate found Calicoat’s evidence unreliable and awarded no damages.

Procedural history

The trial court adopted the magistrate’s decision denying damages to the landlord after a de novo review. The appellant appealed without a proper brief and raised objections to the magistrate’s findings. The appellate court reviewed the trial court’s adoption for abuse of discretion and affirmed.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…