State v. Carter

2025 Ohio 1217 · Court of Appeals of Ohio, Third Appellate District · April 7, 2025 · No. 5-24-35

Summary

This Ohio Court of Appeals decision reviews a criminal defendant's challenge to his life-without-parole sentence for child rape and related offenses. The appellant argued that the trial court improperly considered graphic videos and images depicting uncharged conduct and pending charges from other jurisdictions during sentencing. The appellate court held that the challenged materials were properly part of the presentence investigation report and relevant to assessing the defendant's character and the circumstances of the offense. Consequently, the court found no clear and convincing error and affirmed the trial court's judgment.

Court
Court of Appeals of Ohio, Third Appellate District
Writing for the Court
WILLAMOWSKI, J.
Jurisdiction
Ohio
Decision date
April 7, 2025
Docket number
5-24-35
Procedural posture
Appeal from Hancock County Court of Common Pleas, Trial Court No. 2023 CR 107
Standard of review
Whether the sentencing court’s consideration of materials was contrary to law under R.C. 2953.08(G)(2).
Precedential value
published
Parties
Raymond F. Carter v. State of Ohio
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

sentencingsentencing guidelinescriminal procedureappellate procedurestandard of review

Practice areas

criminal procedure

Questions Presented

  1. Did the trial court err by considering information outside the record at sentencing?
  2. Were the challenged materials irrelevant to Carter’s sentencing in Hancock County?

Holdings

  1. The trial court did not consider information outside the record; therefore, no error was found.
  2. The materials were relevant to the sentencing purpose and therefore admissible.
  3. The judgment of the Hancock County Court of Common Pleas is affirmed.

Key quotations

Accordingly, the sole assignment of error is overruled. (¶22)
The trial court did not consider evidence from outside the record. Accordingly, none of Carter’s arguments establish that his sentence is clearly and convincingly contrary to law. (¶13‑¶22)

Factual background

Law enforcement obtained a search warrant at Carter’s Wood County residence and seized approximately 1,400 digital files, including videos of child sexual abuse and images of a child victim. Carter pleaded guilty to two counts of rape and related offenses in Hancock County. He moved to exclude over 300 pornographic images and several videos at sentencing, asserting they were unrelated to the charges.

Procedural history

Carter pleaded guilty to multiple felony counts in Hancock County and was sentenced to life without parole. He appealed, arguing the trial court improperly considered materials outside the record and irrelevant to sentencing.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…

More from Ohio Court Of Appeals Of Ohio Third Appellate District