State v. Rupp

Rupp, 2025 Ohio 1136 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025) · Ohio Court of Appeals · March 31, 2025 · No. 2024CA0080M

Summary

This Ohio Court of Appeals decision reviews a criminal conviction for receiving stolen property following a guilty plea. The appellant challenged the validity of his plea as involuntary and argued that the trial court improperly considered his refusal to participate in a pre-sentence investigation during sentencing. The appellate court found the plea was knowing, intelligent, and voluntary under Crim.R. 11, and determined the sentence fell within statutory guidelines without violating due process. Consequently, the court affirmed the trial court's judgment.

Court
Ohio Court of Appeals
Writing for the Court
Sutton
Jurisdiction
Ohio
Decision date
March 31, 2025
Docket number
2024CA0080M
Procedural posture
Appeal from judgment of the Medina County Court of Common Pleas
Standard of review
clear and convincing evidence
Precedential value
published
Parties
David J. Rupp v. State of Ohio
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

sentencingsentencing guidelinesappellate procedurestandard of reviewcriminal procedure

Practice areas

criminal procedure

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the trial court erred by accepting a guilty plea that was not knowingly and voluntarily entered
  2. Whether the trial court erred by considering improper factors in sentencing in violation of Ohio statutory sentencing guidelines

Holdings

  1. The plea was knowing, intelligent, and voluntary; the first assignment of error is overruled.
  2. The 11‑month sentence is within the statutory range and the appellate court finds no clear and convincing error; the second assignment of error is overruled.

Key quotations

A review of the record shows Mr. Rupp’s guilty plea was knowing, intelligent, and voluntary. (¶15)
We have reviewed the record, and it does not clearly and convincingly show Mr. Rupp’s sentence is contrary to law or the trial court failed to consider the sentencing factors and the purposes and principles of sentencing set forth in Ohio law. (¶21)

Factual background

Rupp found a credit card, pleaded guilty to receiving stolen property, asserted he did not know it was stolen, refused to participate in a pre‑sentence investigation, and was sentenced to 11 months imprisonment.

Procedural history

Rupp was indicted for receiving stolen property, entered a guilty plea, was sentenced to 11 months imprisonment with credit for time served, and appealed on two grounds: (1) the plea was not knowing and voluntary, and (2) the sentencing court considered improper factors.

Remand instructions

Issue a special mandate directing the Court of Common Pleas, County of Medina, State of Ohio, to carry this judgment into execution.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…