Martin v. Roney

41 Ohio St. (N.S.) 141 (1884) · Ohio Supreme Court · January 15, 1884

Summary

The case concerns whether a prior judgment barred a second action challenging the jurisdiction of county commissioners. The court held that the issue of jurisdiction was already determined and cannot be relitigated.

Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Writing for the Court
McCauley
Jurisdiction
Ohio
Decision date
January 15, 1884
Procedural posture
Appeal from the District Court of Brown County.
Precedential value
Published
Parties
Martin v. Roney
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

res judicatacivil procedure

Practice areas

Civil ProcedureRes Judicata

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the prior judgment in Burgett v. Parker barred the current action under res judicata.

Holdings

  1. The prior judgment is a bar because the same issue of jurisdiction was already determined, and a party cannot re-litigate the same cause of action by alleging different facts.

Key quotations

It is not allowable to allege certain facts as a cause of action and after judgment on the merits, to allege a different state of facts to support a demand for the same relief. (143)

Factual background

Plaintiffs sought to enjoin the collection of an assessment for a road improvement, claiming the county commissioners lacked jurisdiction because the petition was not signed by a majority of landowners. Defendants raised res judicata based on a prior action in 1871 that had already determined the commissioners had jurisdiction.

Procedural history

Plaintiffs brought an action in common pleas to enjoin the collection of a road improvement assessment, alleging the county commissioners lacked jurisdiction. Defendants raised res judicata based on a prior 1871 action. The trial court found for defendants, and on appeal the district court affirmed. Plaintiffs then brought error proceedings to the Supreme Court.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…