Rammage v. Saros

97 Ohio St. 3d 430 (Ohio 2002) · Supreme Court of Ohio · December 13, 2002

Summary

The Ohio Supreme Court affirmed the denial of Rebekah Rammage’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus seeking the return of her child from temporary agency custody. The court held that Rammage had adequate remedies in the ordinary course of law to challenge the dependency complaint and the constitutionality of R.C. 2151.04(C), and that her petition did not sufficiently allege extraordinary circumstances warranting habeas relief.

Court
Supreme Court of Ohio
Writing for the Court
Moyer, C.J.; Douglas; Resnick; F.E. Sweeney; Pfeifer; Cook; Lundberg Stratton
Jurisdiction
Ohio
Decision date
December 13, 2002
Procedural posture
Appeal as of right from the Franklin County Court of Appeals' denial of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus seeking the release of a minor child into the biological mother's custody.
Standard of review
Habeas corpus relief is an extraordinary remedy and is unavailable when the petitioner has an adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law; the petition must also plead with requisite particularity the extraordinary circumstances warranting relief.
Precedential value
Published opinion; precedential authority of the Supreme Court of Ohio.
Parties
Rebekah Rammage v. John Saros, Executive Director of Franklin County Children Services
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

family law procedurechild custodyappellate procedureremediesconstitutional law

Practice areas

family lawjuvenile lawextraordinary writsappellate procedureconstitutional law

Questions Presented

  1. Whether habeas corpus was available to challenge the alleged insufficiency of the dependency complaint when ordinary juvenile-court objections, further proceedings, and appeal were available.
  2. Whether habeas corpus was available to present a constitutional challenge to R.C. 2151.04(C).
  3. Whether the petition sufficiently pleaded extraordinary circumstances warranting habeas corpus relief.

Holdings

  1. Habeas corpus relief is unavailable because Rammage had or had an adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law, including objections to the magistrate's decision, presentation of the issues in subsequent juvenile-court proceedings, and appeal.
  2. Habeas corpus was not an appropriate vehicle for Rammage's constitutional challenge to R.C. 2151.04(C), because such challenges are generally resolved in an ordinary common-pleas-court action rather than an extraordinary writ action.
  3. The petition did not state with the requisite particularity the extraordinary circumstances entitling Rammage to a writ of habeas corpus.

Key quotations

‘[Hjabeas corpus, like other extraordinary writ actions, is not available when there is an adequate remedy at law.’ (¶ 9)
‘Unsupported conclusions contained in a habeas corpus petition are not considered admitted and are insufficient to withstand dismissal.’ (¶ 14)

Factual background

Rebekah Rammage was the biological mother of Sheldon, a minor child born on November 23, 2001. Franklin County Children Services filed a dependency complaint alleging concerns arising from the placement of Rammage's older siblings in foster care, Rammage's temporary-custody agreement, and her failure to complete agreed sexual-abuse classes. The juvenile court denied Rammage's motion to dismiss, granted temporary custody to the agency, ordered a psychological evaluation and supervised visitation, and set the matter for further hearing.

Procedural history

The Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, Division of Domestic Relations and Juvenile Branch, denied Rammage's motion to dismiss a dependency complaint and awarded temporary custody to Franklin County Children Services. Rammage then petitioned the Franklin County Court of Appeals for habeas corpus relief. The court of appeals magistrate recommended denial, the court of appeals overruled Rammage's objections and denied the writ, and the Supreme Court of Ohio affirmed.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…