State ex rel. Holiday v. Industrial Commission

98 Ohio St. 3d 472 (Ohio 2003) · Supreme Court of Ohio · May 7, 2003

Summary

The Ohio Supreme Court affirmed the denial of a mandamus action challenging the Industrial Commission’s termination of temporary total disability compensation. The court held that the claimant’s failure to appeal the termination orders barred mandamus relief and that the commission did not abuse its discretion in declining to exercise continuing jurisdiction after the unsigned medical report was cured.

Court
Supreme Court of Ohio
Writing for the Court
Moyer, C.J.; Resnick, J.; Pfeifer, J.; Cook, J.; Lundberg Stratton, J.; O'Connor, J.; F.E. Sweeney, J.
Jurisdiction
Ohio
Decision date
May 7, 2003
Procedural posture
Claimant appealed as of right from the Franklin County Court of Appeals' denial of her complaint for a writ of mandamus against the Industrial Commission.
Standard of review
The court reviewed whether mandamus was available despite the failure to pursue an administrative appeal and whether the Industrial Commission abused its discretion in declining to exercise continuing jurisdiction under R.C. 4123.52.
Precedential value
Published and precedential decision of the Supreme Court of Ohio
Parties
Barbara Holiday v. Industrial Commission of Ohio, Warrensville Developmental Center
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

workers compensationwrit of certiorariexhaustion of remediesjudicial review of agency actionappellate procedure

Practice areas

Workers' compensationAdministrative lawMandamusAppellate procedure

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Holiday's failure to appeal the Industrial Commission's termination orders barred her subsequent mandamus action.
  2. Whether the Industrial Commission abused its discretion under R.C. 4123.52 by declining to exercise continuing jurisdiction to reopen Holiday's entitlement to temporary total disability compensation after the medical-report signature defect had been cured.

Holdings

  1. A claimant's failure to pursue an available administrative appeal bars a writ of mandamus when that administrative remedy is a plain and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law.
  2. The Industrial Commission did not abuse its discretion in determining that the prerequisites for invoking continuing jurisdiction were not met.

Key quotations

A writ of mandamus will not issue where the relator has a plain and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law. (98 Ohio St. 3d 473)
Accordingly, the failure to pursue an administrative remedy bars a writ of mandamus. (98 Ohio St. 3d 473)

Factual background

Barbara Holiday had an allowed workers' compensation claim arising from a 1995 industrial injury sustained while working for Warrensville Developmental Center. The Industrial Commission terminated her temporary total disability compensation after finding that she had reached maximum medical improvement, relying on a medical report that initially lacked the physician's signature. Holiday did not appeal the termination orders, but later moved to recommence compensation after newly retained counsel raised the signature issue. By the time the motion was heard, the physician had supplied a signed copy of the report, and the commission denied relief.

Procedural history

The Industrial Commission initially terminated temporary total disability compensation after finding that Holiday had reached maximum medical improvement, and later modified the termination date pursuant to State ex rel. Russell v. Industrial Commission. Holiday did not appeal either order. After obtaining counsel, she moved to recommence compensation based on the alleged lack of a signature on the physician's report; the motion was denied administratively, and the Franklin County Court of Appeals denied mandamus. The Supreme Court of Ohio affirmed.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…