Disciplinary Counsel v. Alexicole, Inc.

105 Ohio St. 3d 52 (Ohio 2004) · Supreme Court of Ohio · December 22, 2004

Summary

The Supreme Court of Ohio held that Bandali Dahdah and Alexicole, Inc. engaged in the unauthorized practice of law by representing Ohio residents in securities-arbitration matters and performing related legal services. The court enjoined the respondents from providing legal advice or representing clients or corporations in Ohio unless Dahdah becomes licensed to practice law in Ohio, and taxed costs to the respondents.

Court
Supreme Court of Ohio
Writing for the Court
Per Curiam; Moyer, C.J.; Resnick, J.; F.E. Sweeney, J.; Lundberg Stratton, J.; O’Connor, J.; O’Donnell, J.; Pfeifer, J.
Jurisdiction
Ohio
Decision date
December 22, 2004
Procedural posture
Original unauthorized-practice-of-law proceeding before the Supreme Court of Ohio following the Board of Commissioners on the Unauthorized Practice of Law's default determination and recommendation for an injunction.
Precedential value
Published Ohio Supreme Court opinion; precedential.
Parties
Disciplinary Counsel v. Bandali Dahdah, Alexicole, Inc.
Disposition
other

Topics

administrative lawconstitutional lawequitable reliefremediescommercial litigation

Practice areas

unauthorized practice of lawadministrative lawconstitutional lawremediescommercial litigation

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Dahdah and Alexicole, Inc. engaged in the unauthorized practice of law by representing Ohio residents in securities-arbitration matters and performing related legal services.
  2. Whether the Supreme Court of Ohio should enjoin Dahdah and Alexicole, Inc. from continuing those activities.

Holdings

  1. Representing Ohio residents in securities-arbitration matters, providing legal advice, preparing statements of claim and discovery, participating in prehearing conferences, negotiating settlements, and attending mediation and arbitration hearings on claimants' behalf constitute the practice of law; because Dahdah was not licensed in Ohio, his performance of those activities constituted the unauthorized practice of law.
  2. A corporation cannot lawfully engage in the practice of law, including through officers who are not licensed to practice law.

Key quotations

The unauthorized practice of law consists of rendering legal services, including representation on another’s behalf during discovery, settlement negotiations, and pretrial conferences to resolve claims of legal liability, by any person not admitted to practice in Ohio. (at 52)
Moreover, a corporation cannot lawfully engage in the practice of law, and it cannot lawfully engage in the practice of law through its officers who are not licensed to practice law. (at 53)

Factual background

Alexicole, a Delaware corporation owned and controlled by Bandali Dahdah, engaged in securities arbitration. Dahdah was not licensed to practice law in Ohio, but he represented Ohio claimants and admitted that he regularly prepared statements of claim, conducted discovery, participated in prehearing conferences, negotiated settlements, and participated in mediation and arbitration hearings on behalf of Alexicole clients. One represented client was an Ohio resident pursuing an arbitration claim against McDonald Investments, Inc.

Procedural history

Disciplinary Counsel charged Bandali Dahdah and Alexicole, Inc. with the unauthorized practice of law in representing Ohio residents in securities-arbitration proceedings. After striking respondents' answer because it was not filed by a licensed attorney, the board granted relator's motion for default, considered stipulated facts and supplemental materials, and recommended injunctive relief. The Supreme Court of Ohio concurred in the board's findings and recommendation and entered the injunction.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…