State ex rel. Brady v. Blackwell

112 Ohio St. 3d 12 (Ohio 2006) · Supreme Court of Ohio · November 7, 2006 · No. 2006-1979

Summary

The Ohio Supreme Court affirmed a writ of prohibition preventing removal of Jennifer Brady’s name from the election ballot. The court held that the secretary of state failed to submit sufficient evidentiary proof that the assistant secretary was properly delegated authority to break a county board of elections tie vote under R.C. 111.04 and R.C. 3501.11(X). The court declined to address additional statutory issues because doing so would have resulted in an advisory opinion.

Court
Supreme Court of Ohio
Writing for the Court
Moyer, C.J.; Pfeifer, J.; Lundberg Stratton, J.; O'Connor, J.; O'Donnell, J.; Lanzinger, J.
Jurisdiction
Ohio
Decision date
November 7, 2006
Docket number
2006-1979
Procedural posture
Appeal from the Cuyahoga County Court of Appeals' judgment on remand granting Jennifer Brady a writ of prohibition preventing the removal of her name from the November 7 election ballot.
Standard of review
Whether the secretary of state submitted sufficient evidentiary proof of a proper delegation of authority under R.C. 111.04 to cast the election-board tie-breaking vote.
Precedential value
Published, precedential opinion of the Supreme Court of Ohio
Parties
J. Kenneth Blackwell, Secretary of State v. Jennifer Brady, Cuyahoga County Board of Elections, Robert T. Bennett, Sally D. Florkiewicz, Edward C. Coaxum Jr., Loree K. Soggs
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

election lawelection administrationevidenceappellate procedureremedies

Practice areas

election lawadministrative lawappellate procedureevidenceextraordinary writs

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the secretary of state submitted sufficient evidence to establish that he properly delegated authority under R.C. 111.04 to Assistant Secretary of State Monty Lobb to cast the tie-breaking vote under R.C. 3501.11(X).
  2. Whether Brady was entitled to a writ of prohibition preventing the secretary of state and the board of elections from removing her name from the ballot.

Holdings

  1. The secretary of state failed to prove by appropriate evidence that he had properly delegated authority under R.C. 111.04 to Assistant Secretary Lobb to cast the board of elections' tie-breaking vote.
  2. Brady was entitled to a writ of prohibition preventing the secretary of state and the board of elections from removing her name from the ballot because Lobb's exercise of the tie-breaking authority was unauthorized.

Key quotations

The secretary of state was given the opportunity to present appropriate evidence establishing a proper delegation of authority pursuant to R.C. 111.04. The court of appeals did not err in concluding that the secretary failed to prove that the assistant secretary of state had authority under the applicable statutes to cast the tie-breaking vote on the protests challenging Brady’s candidacy. (112 Ohio St. 3d at 16)
Lobb’s exercise of such power was thus unauthorized, and Brady was entitled to the requested writ of prohibition to prevent the secretary and the board of elections from removing her name from the ballot. (112 Ohio St. 3d at 16)

Factual background

Michael J. O'Shea won the Democratic primary for state representative in Ohio's 16th House District but later withdrew. Democratic Party district committee members selected Jennifer Brady as his replacement, and the Cuyahoga County Board of Elections certified her as the Democratic candidate. After written protests challenged the validity of her replacement nomination, the board deadlocked. Assistant Secretary of State Monty Lobb purported to break the tie on behalf of Secretary of State J. Kenneth Blackwell, but Blackwell later failed to provide sworn or otherwise sufficient evidence establishing that he had properly delegated that authority to Lobb.

Procedural history

After the Cuyahoga County Board of Elections deadlocked on protests challenging Brady's candidacy, Assistant Secretary of State Monty Lobb purported to cast the tie-breaking vote on behalf of Secretary of State Blackwell. The court of appeals granted Brady a writ of prohibition, and this court initially reversed and remanded for evidence concerning Lobb's authority. On remand, the court of appeals again granted the writ after finding that Blackwell had failed to submit sufficient evidence of a proper delegation. The Supreme Court of Ohio affirmed.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…