Waters v. Wolfe

114 Ohio St. 3d 151 (Ohio 2007) · Supreme Court of Ohio · August 8, 2007

Summary

The Supreme Court of Ohio affirmed the dismissal of Kirk Waters's habeas corpus petition. The court held that, regardless of whether Waters should have been permitted to amend filing deficiencies, his petition failed to state a viable claim because Ohio law authorized his prosecution for Butler County offenses after his extradition from Kentucky on Clermont County charges.

Holdings

  1. A person returned to Ohio by, or after waiver of, extradition proceedings may be tried in Ohio for other crimes committed in Ohio in addition to the offense specified in the extradition requisition. Because Waters waived extradition to Ohio, R.C. 2963.26 authorized the Butler County Common Pleas Court to try him for the Butler County offenses.
  2. The court did not need to resolve whether amendment was permissible because, regardless of the amendment issue, the petition failed to state a viable habeas corpus claim.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Waters's petition stated a viable habeas corpus claim when he was tried in Ohio for offenses not specified in the extradition proceedings.
  2. Whether the court of appeals was required to permit Waters to amend his habeas petition to comply with the verification and affidavit requirements of R.C. 2725.04 and R.C. 2969.25(A).

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (3)

  • Gaskins v. Shiplevy, 74 Ohio St. 3d 149, 150, 656 N.E.2d 1282 (1995)(followed)
  • Snitzky v. Wilson, Trumbull App. No. 2003-T-0095, 2004-Ohio-7229, 2004 WL 3090238, ¶ 37(considered)
  • State ex rel. Childs v. Wingard, 83 Ohio St. 3d 346, 348, 699 N.E.2d 1278 (1998)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…