Disciplinary Counsel v. Bogdanski

137 Ohio St. 3d 1226, 2013-Ohio-5011 · Supreme Court of Ohio · November 15, 2013 · No. 2013-0195

Summary

The Supreme Court of Ohio indefinitely suspended April Marie Bogdanski from the practice of law after she failed to object to the conversion of an interim default judgment suspension. The order imposes cessation, continuing legal education, client-notification, reimbursement, recordkeeping, and reinstatement requirements.

Court
Supreme Court of Ohio
Writing for the Court
O'Connor, C.J.; Pfeifer, J.; O'Donnell, J.; Lanzinger, J.; Kennedy, J.; French, J.; O'Neill, J.
Jurisdiction
Ohio
Decision date
November 15, 2013
Docket number
2013-0195
Procedural posture
On certification of default, the Supreme Court of Ohio considered whether to convert an interim default-judgment suspension into an indefinite suspension after respondent filed no objections.
Precedential value
published and precedential disciplinary order
Parties
Disciplinary Counsel v. April Marie Bogdanski
Disposition
other

Topics

administrative procedure actadministrative lawagency adjudicationremedies

Practice areas

legal ethics and professional responsibilityattorney disciplineadministrative lawremedies

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the respondent's interim default-judgment suspension should be converted into an indefinite suspension after she failed to file objections to the certification of default and show-cause order.

Holdings

  1. Under Gov.Bar R. V(6a)(E)(1), the court converted respondent's interim default-judgment suspension into an indefinite suspension from the practice of law because respondent filed no objections to the show-cause order.

Key quotations

respondent, April Marie Bogdanski, Attorney Registration No. 0074879, last known business address in Columbus, Ohio, is indefinitely suspended from the practice of law. (¶ 2)
It is further ordered that respondent immediately cease and desist from the practice of law in any form (¶ 3)

Factual background

The Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline filed a certification of default concerning respondent April Marie Bogdanski. The Supreme Court had previously imposed an interim default-judgment suspension and directed respondent to show cause why it should not become indefinite. Respondent filed no objections.

Procedural history

On March 19, 2013, the Supreme Court of Ohio imposed an interim default-judgment suspension under Gov.Bar R. V(6a)(B)(1) and ordered respondent to show cause why the suspension should not be converted into an indefinite suspension. Respondent filed no objections. The court then entered an order indefinitely suspending her from the practice of law and imposing related compliance obligations.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…