State ex rel. Maras v. LaRose

2022-Ohio-3295 (Ohio 2022) · Supreme Court of Ohio · September 20, 2022 · No. 2022-1083

Summary

The Supreme Court of Ohio granted a writ of mandamus ordering the Ohio Secretary of State to count nine additional verified petition signatures and certify Terpsehore P. Maras as an independent candidate for Secretary of State. The court held that refusing to count signatures submitted by county boards before the statutory July 15 deadline was in clear disregard of R.C. 3513.262.

Court
Supreme Court of Ohio
Writing for the Court
Per Curiam; Maureen O'Connor, Chief Justice; Michael P. Donnelly, Justice; Jennifer Brunner, Justice; Judith L. French? No
Jurisdiction
Ohio
Decision date
September 20, 2022
Docket number
2022-1083
Procedural posture
Original expedited action in mandamus seeking to compel the Ohio Secretary of State to certify Maras's name to the November 8, 2022 ballot as an independent candidate for Ohio Secretary of State.
Standard of review
To obtain mandamus relief, the relator must establish by clear and convincing evidence a clear legal right to the requested relief, a clear legal duty on the respondent's part, and the absence of an adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law. The court also examined whether the Secretary acted in fraud, corruption, abuse of discretion, or clear disregard of applicable law.
Precedential value
Published Supreme Court of Ohio opinion; precedential
Parties
Terpsehore P. Maras, relator v. Frank LaRose, Ohio Secretary of State, respondent
Disposition
writ_granted

Topics

ballot accesselection administrationelection lawremediesstatutory interpretation

Practice areas

election lawadministrative lawmandamusstatutory interpretation

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the Secretary of State acted in clear disregard of applicable law by refusing to count nine additional signatures certified by county boards before the statutory July 15 deadline.
  2. Whether defects in Maras's verification affidavit required dismissal of the mandamus action.

Holdings

  1. The affidavit supporting Maras's mandamus complaint was valid because, when read as a whole, it demonstrated that Maras had been sworn and verified the facts alleged in the complaint.
  2. The Secretary of State acted in clear disregard of applicable law by refusing to count the nine additional signatures verified by the Cuyahoga and Columbiana County boards before the statutory deadline.

Key quotations

If statutory language is clear and unambiguous, we apply the statute as written, without adding or deleting words. (¶ 28)
We hold that the secretary acted in clear disregard of applicable law when he refused to count the additional verified signatures from Cuyahoga and Columbiana Counties. (¶ 29)

Factual background

Maras filed a petition to run as an independent candidate for Ohio Secretary of State containing 5,873 signatures. County boards initially verified 5,010 signatures by July 5, but Cuyahoga and Columbiana Counties later submitted amended certifications validating nine additional signatures before the statutory July 15 deadline. The Secretary refused to count those nine signatures, and after a protest hearing and invalidation of 17 signatures, decertified Maras because the official total was 4,993.

Procedural history

Maras submitted an independent-candidate nominating petition. After county boards initially verified enough signatures, the Secretary of State refused to count nine additional signatures verified through amended certification forms submitted on July 12 and July 14. Following a protest hearing, the Secretary decertified Maras after invalidating 17 signatures, reducing her total to 4,993. Maras then filed this original mandamus action, and the Supreme Court of Ohio granted the writ based on the nine additional signatures.

Remand instructions

The Secretary of State was ordered to add nine valid signatures to Maras's total and certify her name to the November 8, 2022 ballot as an independent candidate for Ohio Secretary of State.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…