State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. Caporal

Caporal, 2014 OK 104 (Okla. 2014) · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · November 24, 2014 · No. SCBD-6111

Summary

The Oklahoma Supreme Court approved Sam George Caporal’s resignation from the Oklahoma Bar Association while disciplinary proceedings were pending. The order treated the resignation as tantamount to disbarment, required client notification and reimbursement of specified costs and Client Security Fund payments, and barred reinstatement applications for five years.

Court
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Writing for the Court
Per Curiam; Colbert, C.J.; Reif, V.C.J.; Kauger, J.; Watt, J.; Winchester, J.; Edmondson, J.; Taylor, J.; Combs, J.
Jurisdiction
Oklahoma
Decision date
November 24, 2014
Docket number
SCBD-6111
Procedural posture
The Oklahoma Bar Association initiated attorney-discipline proceedings against Caporal. After a hearing before the Professional Responsibility Tribunal but before the tribunal issued its report, Caporal submitted an affidavit seeking resignation from the Oklahoma Bar Association pending disciplinary proceedings. The Supreme Court considered and approved the resignation.
Precedential value
published Oklahoma Supreme Court opinion
Parties
State of Oklahoma ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. Sam George Caporal
Disposition
approved

Topics

guardianship procedureguardianshipscostsappellate procedure

Practice areas

attorney disciplineprofessional responsibilityguardianship

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Caporal's resignation pending disciplinary proceedings satisfied Rule 8.1 of the Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings.
  2. What consequences follow from approving an attorney's resignation pending disciplinary proceedings.

Holdings

  1. Caporal's resignation pending disciplinary proceedings complied with Rule 8.1 because it was freely and voluntarily rendered, was not the product of coercion or duress, and was submitted with knowledge of the consequences.
  2. Because resignation pending discipline is tantamount to disbarment, Caporal's name must be stricken from the roll of attorneys, he may not seek reinstatement for five years, and he must satisfy the applicable reinstatement, client-notification, Client Security Fund, and costs requirements.

Key quotations

Because resignation pending discipline is tantamount to disbarment, Caporal may not make an application for reinstatement prior to the expiration of five years from the date this order becomes final. (¶6)

Factual background

The Oklahoma Bar Association alleged that Caporal, while serving as a court-appointed guardian, failed to maintain accurate records and file required accountings, failed to produce medical and financial records, and was held in contempt for failing to comply with an accounting order. The Bar also alleged that he misrepresented the ward's assets and his fees, paid himself fees without court approval, exceeded the statutory fee limit, and attempted to conceal the excess. After the disciplinary hearing and before the tribunal issued its report, Caporal voluntarily resigned and waived his right to contest the allegations.

Procedural history

The Oklahoma Bar Association filed its disciplinary complaint on February 6, 2014. A Professional Responsibility Tribunal hearing occurred on September 25, 2014. On October 20, 2014, Caporal submitted an affidavit of resignation pending disciplinary proceedings, and the Bar filed an application seeking approval; the Supreme Court approved the resignation and imposed the consequences required by the disciplinary rules.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…