Summary
The Oklahoma Supreme Court assumed original jurisdiction and granted extraordinary relief to the proponents of Initiative Petition 421, State Question 805. The Court issued a writ of mandamus directing the Oklahoma Secretary of State to accept the signed petitions for filing and promptly begin and complete the signature-counting process despite the COVID-19 emergency.
Holdings
- The Oklahoma Supreme Court may assume original jurisdiction over a publici juris controversy when urgency and the need for a judicial determination are present.
- The Secretary of State has a clear, ministerial, and mandatory duty to accept for filing initiative petitions tendered in compliance with the statute and to begin the signature-counting process.
- The Secretary of State's temporary tolling of the signature-gathering deadline did not alter the proponents' statutory rights under 34 O.S. Supp. 2015, § 8(G).
- The Secretary of State's asserted practical and safety concerns did not establish that the signature-counting process could not be performed efficiently with necessary safety precautions and did not justify withholding performance of the mandatory duties.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Oklahoma Supreme Court should assume original jurisdiction over the proponents' publici juris request for extraordinary relief.
- Whether the Secretary of State had a mandatory statutory duty to accept the signed petitions for filing and begin the signature-counting process under 34 O.S. Supp. 2015, § 8(G).
- Whether the Secretary's tolling of the signature-gathering deadline during the COVID-19 emergency altered the proponents' statutory rights under § 8(G).
- Whether practical and safety concerns related to the COVID-19 pandemic justified refusing or delaying performance of the Secretary's ministerial duties.
Disposition
writ_granted
Cases Cited (5)
- Fent v. Contingency Review Board, 2007 OK 27, ¶ 11, 163 P.3d 512(discussed)
- Threadgill v. Cross, 1910 OK 165, ¶ 5, 109 P. 558(distinguished)
- In re Initiative Petition No. 349, State Question No. 642, 1992 OK 122, 838 P.2d 1(discussed)
- In re Initiative Petition No. 397, State Question No. 767, 2014 OK 23, ¶ 9, 326 P.3d 496(discussed)
- Norris v. Cross, 1909 OK 316, 105 P. 1000(discussed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…