Summary
The Supreme Court of Oregon held that an attorney who represents himself in a public-records action may recover reasonable attorney fees under ORS 192.490(3). The court interpreted “attorney fees” to include the reasonable value of legal services performed by an attorney acting pro se, without requiring a separate client or an obligation to pay for the services. The court reversed the Oregon Court of Appeals and remanded for further proceedings.
Holdings
- An attorney who represents himself in a public-records action may recover attorney fees under ORS 192.490(3) for the reasonable value of the legal services he performs on his own behalf.
- For purposes of ORS 192.490(3), "attorney" means an individual who practices law and does not require an agency relationship with a separate client.
Questions Presented
- Whether an attorney who represents himself in a public-records action may recover attorney fees under ORS 192.490(3).
- Whether the phrase "attorney fees" in ORS 192.490(3) requires that the prevailing party incur an obligation to pay for legal services or have a separate client.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (7)
- State v. Tate, 347 Or. 318, 324, 220 P.3d 1176 (2009)(followed)
- Chalmers v. Oregon Auto. Ins. Co., 263 Or. 449, 455, 502 P.2d 1378 (1972)(followed)
- Domingo v. Anderson, 325 Or. 385, 938 P.2d 206 (1997)(followed)
- Colby v. Gunson, 229 Or. App. 167, 210 P.3d 917 (2009)(reversed)
- Colby v. Gunson, 224 Or. App. 666, 199 P.3d 350 (2008)(followed)
- In re Glass, 308 Or. 297, 301-02, 779 P.2d 612 (1989)(followed)
- State ex rel. Binschus v. Schreiber, 141 Or. App. 288, 294, 917 P.2d 1063 (1996)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…