Commonwealth v. Correa

2026 Pa. Super. 176 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · August 5, 2026 · No. 1492 EDA 2025

Summary

The Pennsylvania Superior Court affirmed Jesus Correa's judgment of sentence for possession with intent to deliver and knowing or intentional possession of a controlled substance. The court held that police had reasonable suspicion to conduct a Terry frisk based on the totality of the circumstances, including Correa's presence in a stolen vehicle, an open firearms charge, and the high-crime area, and therefore did not reach his alternative argument concerning probable cause for arrest.

Court
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Writing for the Court
Sullivan, J.; Kunselman, J.; Nichols, J.
Jurisdiction
Pennsylvania
Decision date
August 5, 2026
Docket number
1492 EDA 2025
Procedural posture
Appeal from a judgment of sentence entered after a nonjury trial and denial of a motion to suppress evidence.
Standard of review
The appellate court reviews whether the suppression court's factual findings are supported by the record and whether its legal conclusions are correct. It views the prosecution's evidence and uncontradicted defense evidence in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, defers to the suppression court's credibility and weight determinations when supported by the record, limits its scope of review to the suppression-hearing record, and reviews legal conclusions de novo.
Precedential value
Published precedential opinion
Parties
Jesus Correa v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

suppression of evidencefourth amendmentsearch and seizurecriminal procedureappellate procedure

Practice areas

criminal procedureconstitutional lawappellate procedureevidence

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the warrantless pat-down search violated the Fourth Amendment or Article I, Section 8 of the Pennsylvania Constitution because the police lacked reasonable suspicion that Correa was armed and dangerous.
  2. Whether the search could be justified as a search incident to arrest when the police allegedly lacked probable cause to arrest Correa.

Holdings

  1. The Terry frisk was lawful because the vehicle stop was valid and the totality of the circumstances gave the officer reasonable suspicion that Correa was armed and dangerous.
  2. Correa's challenge to the search incident to arrest exception could not provide relief because the frisk was independently valid under Terry; the court therefore did not decide whether probable cause existed to arrest Correa before the narcotics were discovered.

Key quotations

The second type of interaction, an investigative detention, is a temporary detention of a citizen. This interaction constitutes a seizure of a person, and to be constitutionally valid police must have a reasonable suspicion that criminal activity is afoot. (5-6)
Considering the totality of the circumstances, Sergeant Dooley had reasonable suspicion Correa may be armed and dangerous, permitting a Terry frisk. (8-9)

Factual background

Police stopped a car with a stolen license plate in a high-crime area while investigating narcotics activity and violent crimes. Correa was a passenger, neither he nor the driver could produce vehicle registration, and Correa stated that he had just paid bail on an open firearms case. Before placing Correa in a police vehicle for investigative detention, an officer frisked him after observing him press his body against the car; the frisk revealed 96 packages containing fentanyl.

Procedural history

Police stopped a vehicle in which Correa was a passenger because it displayed a stolen license plate. After Correa disclosed that he had an open firearms case, officers removed him from the vehicle and conducted a Terry frisk, recovering fentanyl. The suppression court denied Correa's motion to suppress, and the trial court convicted him of possession with intent to deliver and knowing or intentional possession of a controlled substance and sentenced him to one to two years of imprisonment followed by two years of probation. The Superior Court affirmed the judgment of sentence.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…