Commonwealth v. Pennsylvania State Troopers Ass'n, 611 Pa. 56

23 A.3d 966 (Pa. 2011) · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · April 28, 2011

Summary

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court reviewed whether an Act 111 interest arbitration award could require the Commonwealth to pay state troopers on union leave compensation designated by their union. The Court held that the award did not violate the State Employees' Retirement Code because the relevant statutory provision addressed retirement rights and did not establish a ceiling on union-leave salaries. The Court reversed the Commonwealth Court's invalidation of the union-leave provision.

Holdings

  1. Section 5302(b)(2) does not impose a statutory ceiling limiting union-leave salaries to the amount a trooper would have received in full-time active service. The provision primarily governs credited service and pension-related rights and does not prohibit an Act 111 arbitration panel from awarding higher union-leave compensation.
  2. Because the union-leave wage provision did not require the Commonwealth to perform an illegal act or an act it could not voluntarily undertake, the provision was within the arbitration panel's authority and was beyond judicial review under narrow certiorari.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the Act 111 interest-arbitration award's union-leave wage provision violated section 5302(b)(2) of the State Employees' Retirement Code.
  2. Whether the award required the Commonwealth to perform an illegal act and therefore exceeded the arbitration panel's authority under the narrow-certiorari standard.

Disposition

reversed_and_remanded

Cases Cited (14)

  • Commonwealth v. Pennsylvania State Troopers Ass'n, 979 A.2d 442 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2009)(reversed)
  • Pennsylvania State Police v. Pennsylvania State Troopers' Ass'n, 540 Pa. 66, 656 A.2d 83 (1995)(followed)
  • City of Pittsburgh v. Fraternal Order of Police, Fort Pitt Lodge No. 1, 595 Pa. 47, 938 A.2d 225 (2007)(followed)
  • Kirsch v. Public School Employees' Retirement Board, 929 A.2d 663 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2007)(distinguished)
  • Kirsch v. Public School Employees' Retirement Board, 603 Pa. 439, 985 A.2d 671 (2009)(distinguished)
  • City of Philadelphia v. Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge No. 5, 564 Pa. 290, 768 A.2d 291 (2001)(followed)
  • Town of McCandless v. McCandless Police Officers Ass'n, 587 Pa. 525, 901 A.2d 991 (2006)(followed)
  • Pinto v. State Civil Service Commission, 590 Pa. 311, 912 A.2d 787 (2006)(followed)
  • Mishoe v. Erie Insurance Co., 573 Pa. 267, 824 A.2d 1153 (2003)(followed)
  • O'Rourke v. Department of Corrections, 566 Pa. 161, 778 A.2d 1194 (2001)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 14.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…