Summary
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania considered whether the Medical Records Act applies to pharmacies and whether a pharmacy may charge a flat fee for reproducing pharmacy records. The court held that the Act does not apply to pharmacies and therefore did not reach the flat-fee issue. It reversed the Superior Court's decision and reinstated the dismissal of the action against Rite Aid.
Holdings
- The Medical Records Act does not apply to pharmacies because pharmacies are not health care providers or health care facilities within the meaning of the Act.
- Because the MRA does not apply to pharmacies, the court did not decide whether or under what circumstances a pharmacy could charge a flat fee for reproducing records under the MRA.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Pennsylvania Medical Records Act applies to a pharmacy's provision of copies of pharmacy records.
- Whether, under the Medical Records Act, a pharmacy may charge a flat fee for reproducing pharmacy records when the customer receives an invoice and pays it without objection before receiving the records.
Disposition
reversed
Cases Cited (10)
- Chiurazzi Law Inc. v. MRO Corp., 97 A.3d 275, 276 (Pa. 2014)(followed)
- Landay v. Rite Aid, 40 A.3d 1280 (Pa. Super. 2012)(reversed)
- Landay v. Rite Aid, 73 A.3d 577 (Pa. 2013) (order)(followed procedurally)
- Dechert LLP v. Commonwealth, 998 A.2d 575, 579 (Pa. 2010)(followed)
- Delaware Cty. v. First Union Corp., 992 A.2d 112, 118 (Pa. 2010)(followed)
- Martin v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing, 905 A.2d 438, 443 (Pa. 2006)(followed)
- Mishoe v. Erie Insurance Co., 824 A.2d 1153, 1155 (Pa. 2003)(followed)
- HSP Gaming, L.P. v. City of Philadelphia, 954 A.2d 1156, 1182 (Pa. 2008)(followed)
- Rehab Hospital Services Corp. v. Health Systems Agency of Southwestern Pennsylvania, 475 A.2d 883, 887 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1984)(followed)
- Tooey v. AK Steel Corp., 81 A.3d 851, 857 (Pa. 2013)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…