Summary
The Supreme Court of Rhode Island affirmed summary judgment for PFL Life Insurance Company in a negligence action arising from an assault at a shopping mall. The majority held that the independent-contractor rule barred imputing the security contractor's alleged negligence to PFL and declined to adopt Restatement (Second) of Torts § 425 because the complaint was treated as asserting general negligence rather than premises liability. Two justices dissented, concluding that the complaint adequately alleged premises liability and that a commercial landowner's duty to provide reasonably safe premises could not be delegated to an independent contractor.
Holdings
- Summary judgment for PFL was proper because RIBI was an independent contractor, and under the general independent-contractor rule PFL was not liable for RIBI's alleged negligent security services absent an applicable exception.
- The complaint did not assert a premises-liability claim because it alleged only a general claim of negligent failure to provide security and did not allege the landowner's duty to maintain the premises in a reasonably safe condition or otherwise provide fair notice of a premises-liability theory.
- The court declined to adopt Restatement (Second) of Torts § 425 because the section applies to premises-liability claims, and adopting it would not affect the outcome of the plaintiff's general negligence claim.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Superior Court properly granted summary judgment on Konar's general negligence claim under the independent-contractor rule.
- Whether Konar's complaint adequately asserted a premises-liability claim that would impose a nondelegable duty on PFL to maintain reasonably safe premises and provide reasonable security.
- Whether the Rhode Island Supreme Court should adopt Restatement (Second) of Torts § 425 concerning an owner's liability for an independent contractor's negligent failure to maintain land open to the public in a reasonably safe condition.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (22)
- Sobanski v. Donahue, 792 A.2d 57, 59 (R.I. 2002)(followed)
- Accent Store Design, Inc. v. Marathon House, Inc., 674 A.2d 1223, 1225 (R.I. 1996)(followed)
- Bourg v. Bristol Boat Co., 705 A.2d 969, 971 (R.I. 1998)(followed)
- Woodland Manor III Associates v. Keeney, 713 A.2d 806, 810 (R.I. 1998)(followed)
- Rotelli v. Catanzaro, 686 A.2d 91, 93 (R.I. 1996)(followed)
- Bromaghim v. Furney, 808 A.2d 615, 617 (R.I. 2002) (per curiam)(followed)
- East Coast Collision & Restoration, Inc. v. Allyn, 742 A.2d 273, 275-76 (R.I. 1999) (per curiam)(distinguished)
- Webbier v. Thoroughbred Racing Protective Bureau, Inc., 105 R.I. 605, 611-12, 254 A.2d 285, 289 (1969)(followed)
- Ballet Fabrics, Inc. v. Four Dee Realty Co., 112 R.I. 612, 621-22, 314 A.2d 1, 6-7 (1974)(followed)
- Kurczy v. St. Joseph Veterans Association, Inc., 820 A.2d 929, 935 (R.I. 2003)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 22.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.