In re Estate of Ann Marie Picillo

99 A.3d 975 (R.I. 2014) · Supreme Court of Rhode Island · October 15, 2014 · No. 2011-262-Appeal (KP 07-1217)

Summary

The Rhode Island Supreme Court affirmed a Superior Court judgment upholding Ann Marie Picillo’s will. The court rejected challenges alleging noncompliance with statutory execution formalities, undue influence, lack of testamentary capacity, and insufficient findings under Rule 52(a).

Holdings

  1. The will was executed in compliance with § 33-5-5. Although the issue was not litigated before the trial justice, the record and factual findings established the statutory formalities, and the presumption of validity was not overcome.
  2. The will was not the product of undue influence.
  3. The decedent possessed the requisite testamentary capacity when she executed the will.
  4. The trial justice's written decision contained sufficient findings of fact and conclusions of law to satisfy Rule 52(a).

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the will was executed in compliance with Rhode Island General Laws § 33-5-5.
  2. Whether the will was procured by undue influence.
  3. Whether the decedent possessed testamentary capacity when she executed the will.
  4. Whether the trial justice made sufficient findings of fact and conclusions of law under Rule 52(a) of the Superior Court Rules of Civil Procedure.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (15)

  • State v. Pona, 66 A.3d 454, 468 (R.I. 2013)(followed)
  • State v. McManus, 990 A.2d 1229, 1237 (R.I. 2010)(followed)
  • Process Engineers & Constructors, Inc. v. DiGregorio, Inc., 93 A.3d 1047, 1051-52 (R.I. 2014)(followed)
  • Wellington Condominium Association v. Wellington Cove Condominium Association, 68 A.3d 594, 599 (R.I. 2013)(followed)
  • Lett v. Giuliano, 35 A.3d 870, 877 (R.I. 2012)(followed)
  • Pollard v. Hastings, 862 A.2d 770, 776 n.3, 777 (R.I. 2004)(followed)
  • Donnelly v. Cowsill, 716 A.2d 742, 747 (R.I. 1998)(followed)
  • Anderson v. Town of East Greenwich, 460 A.2d 420, 423-24 (R.I. 1983)(followed)
  • Filippi v. Filippi, 818 A.2d 608, 630 (R.I. 2003)(followed)
  • Tinney v. Tinney, 770 A.2d 420, 437-38 (R.I. 2001)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 15.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…