State v. Luke P. Peters

172 A.3d 156 (R.I. 2017) · Supreme Court of Rhode Island · November 14, 2017 · No. 2016-113-C.A. (P2/15-98A); P2-2015-98A

Summary

The Rhode Island Supreme Court reviewed the dismissal of charges against Luke P. Peters for operating or driving a motor vehicle while intoxicated, recklessly, or with a revoked license. The court held that a passenger who forcibly seizes and turns the steering wheel of a moving vehicle may qualify as an operator under Rhode Island law and vacated the Superior Court's dismissal.

Court
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Writing for the Court
Maureen McKenna Goldberg, Associate Justice; Frank Williams Suttell, Chief Justice; Maureen McKenna Goldberg, Justice; Paul A. Flaherty, Justice; William P. Robinson III, Justice; Francis X. Indeglia, Justice
Jurisdiction
Rhode Island
Decision date
November 14, 2017
Docket number
2016-113-C.A. (P2/15-98A); P2-2015-98A
Procedural posture
The State appealed from the Superior Court's grant of the defendant's Rule 9.1 motion to dismiss counts 1 through 4 and count 6 of a criminal information for lack of probable cause. The State limited its appeal to the dismissal of the motor-vehicle-related counts and waived appeal of the assault count.
Standard of review
Review of a decision on a Rule 9.1 motion to dismiss an information is limited to whether the decision was clearly erroneous. The Court reviews statutory-construction questions de novo. Probable cause is assessed from the four corners of the information package, giving the State the benefit of every reasonable inference.
Precedential value
Published Rhode Island Supreme Court opinion; precedential
Parties
State of Rhode Island v. Luke P. Peters
Disposition
vacated

Topics

criminal procedureprobable causestatutory interpretationappellate procedurestandard of review

Practice areas

criminal lawcriminal proceduremotor vehicle offensesstatutory interpretation

Questions Presented

  1. Whether a passenger in a moving motor vehicle who forcibly seizes and turns the steering wheel can be considered an operator or driver under Rhode Island's statutory definitions.
  2. Whether the alleged conduct supplied probable cause to prosecute Peters for driving under the influence resulting in serious bodily injury, driving so as to endanger resulting in serious or nonserious bodily injury, and driving with a revoked license.
  3. Whether the Superior Court clearly erred in granting Peters's Rule 9.1 motion to dismiss the motor-vehicle-related counts.

Holdings

  1. Rhode Island General Laws § 31-1-17 provides two types of operators: a driver and a person in actual physical control of a vehicle. A passenger who forcibly takes control of the steering wheel of a moving vehicle and steers it exercises actual physical control and may be deemed an operator.
  2. The allegations that Peters forcibly seized and turned the steering wheel of a moving vehicle, causing it to crash and injure occupants, were sufficient to support probable cause for prosecution under §§ 31-27-1.2, 31-27-2.6, and 31-11-18.

Key quotations

Section 31-1-17 provides for two types of operators: the driver or a person who is in actual physical control of the vehicle. (at 7)
By forcibly controlling and altering a fundamental feature of a moving vehicle—such as steering the direction of the vehicle—defendant placed himself squarely in the realm of an operator of a vehicle. (at 9)

Factual background

On August 6, 2014, Peters consumed alcohol with two adults and two minors before traveling as a rear-seat passenger in a vehicle driven by John Willette. While the vehicle was moving at a high rate of speed, Peters suddenly leaped forward, forcibly grabbed the steering wheel, and turned it, causing the vehicle to leave the roadway and roll over. The crash caused serious bodily injuries to one minor and bodily injuries to the other.

Procedural history

A Superior Court magistrate denied Peters's motion to dismiss, finding probable cause to conclude that he was operating a motor vehicle even though he was not driving it. Peters appealed to a Superior Court justice, who concluded that grabbing and tugging the steering wheel did not constitute driving or operating and dismissed counts 1 through 4 and count 6. The Superior Court denied the State's motion to reconsider, and the State timely appealed. The Rhode Island Supreme Court summarily decided the appeal after a show-cause proceeding and vacated the Superior Court judgment.

Remand instructions

The papers in the case may be remanded to the Superior Court for further proceedings.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…