Summary
The Supreme Court of South Carolina held that a non-contributing joint account holder was not entitled to the statutory presumption of survivorship after withdrawing all funds before the contributing account holder's death. Because the funds were no longer on deposit when the decedent died, the court concluded they belonged to the decedent during her lifetime and were assets of her estate. The court affirmed the Court of Appeals.
Holdings
- A noncontributing joint-account party is not entitled to the statutory survivorship presumption for funds withdrawn before the contributing party's death because the funds were no longer remaining on deposit in the joint account at the time of death.
- The ownership provision in section 62-6-103(a) applies to funds transferred while all account parties were alive, and funds contributed solely by the decedent belonged to the decedent at the time of the transfer.
- The statutes governing multi-party accounts and survivorship rights are plain and unambiguous, so the Court must apply their ordinary meaning rather than impose another meaning.
Questions Presented
- Whether a noncontributing party to a joint bank account loses the benefit of the statutory survivorship presumption when the party withdraws all funds before the contributing party's death.
- Whether the statutory ownership provision governing joint accounts applies to funds withdrawn while all account parties are still living.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (3)
- Hodges v. Rainey, 341 S.C. 79, 533 S.E.2d 578 (2000)(followed)
- Vaughn v. Bernhardt, 339 S.C. 125, 528 S.E.2d 82 (Ct. App. 2000)(affirmed)
- Shourek v. Stirling, 621 N.E.2d 1107 (Ind. 1993)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…