In re Craig

352 S.C. 8 (2002) · Supreme Court of South Carolina · October 28, 2002

Summary

The South Carolina Supreme Court accepted an attorney’s Agreement for Discipline by Consent and issued a public reprimand. The misconduct involved errors and delay in real estate matters, inappropriate conduct and lack of communication in a domestic matter, failure to respond to disciplinary authorities, and unpaid federal employer-withholding tax liens; the attorney also agreed to resign from the South Carolina Bar.

Court
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Writing for the Court
Chief Justice Toal; Justice Moore; Justice Waller; Justice Burnett; Justice Pleicones
Jurisdiction
South Carolina
Decision date
October 28, 2002
Procedural posture
Attorney disciplinary matter submitted to the Supreme Court of South Carolina under an Agreement for Discipline by Consent. The respondent admitted misconduct and consented to a sanction ranging from an admonition to a public reprimand, and also agreed to resign from the South Carolina Bar.
Precedential value
Published South Carolina Supreme Court disciplinary opinion
Disposition
other

Topics

real estatefamily lawtax

Practice areas

attorney disciplineprofessional responsibilitylegal ethics

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the court should accept the Agreement for Discipline by Consent after respondent admitted violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct and the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement.
  2. What sanction should be imposed in light of respondent's admitted misconduct and agreement to resign from the South Carolina Bar.

Holdings

  1. The court accepted the Agreement for Discipline by Consent because respondent fully acknowledged that his conduct violated the Rules of Professional Conduct and the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement.
  2. The court imposed a public reprimand and accepted respondent's resignation from membership in the South Carolina Bar.

Key quotations

We accept the agreement and issue a public reprimand. (at 8)
In light of respondent’s resignation from the South Carolina Bar, we accept this agreement and publicly reprimand respondent. (at 11)

Factual background

Respondent committed misconduct in several matters, including failing to prepare a deed correctly, failing to address an unsatisfied lien in a real estate transaction, and neglecting a domestic-matter client. In the domestic matter, respondent made inappropriate and sexually suggestive remarks, falsely stated that a hearing had been scheduled, failed to return calls, and did not respond to a fee-refund request. Respondent also failed to respond timely to the Office of Disciplinary Counsel and had outstanding employer-withholding-tax liens, including an unsatisfied federal lien.

Procedural history

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel and respondent entered into an Agreement for Discipline by Consent under Rule 21 of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement. The agreement was presented to the Supreme Court of South Carolina, which accepted it and imposed a public reprimand in light of respondent's resignation from the South Carolina Bar.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…