Summary
The Supreme Court of South Carolina accepted an attorney's Agreement for Discipline by Consent after finding violations involving client representation, communication, trust-account management, and cooperation with disciplinary authorities. The court imposed a one-year suspension retroactive to the respondent's interim suspension, along with costs and compliance-related filing requirements.
Holdings
- The court accepted the Agreement for Discipline by Consent after respondent admitted the charged misconduct and consented to a sanction authorized by the governing disciplinary rules.
- Respondent was suspended from the practice of law for one year.
- The one-year suspension was made retroactive to April 30, 2008, the date of respondent's interim suspension.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Supreme Court should accept the parties' Agreement for Discipline by Consent.
- What sanction should be imposed for respondent's admitted violations of the South Carolina Rules of Professional Conduct and Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement.
- Whether the suspension should be made retroactive to the date of respondent's interim suspension.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (2)
- In the Matter of Brannon, 377 S.C. 474, 661 S.E.2d 98 (2008)(cited)
- In the Matter of Treacy, 277 S.C. 514, 290 S.E.2d 240 (1982)(cited)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…